Snapshot #3
The IBM REINVENTING EDUCATION GRANT PROGRAM forms the centerpiece of IBM?s commitment to education. Through Reinventing Education, IBM is working with school partners throughout the world to develop and implement innovative technology solutions designed to meet the goals of higher student achievement and enhanced academic productivity.
Reinventing Education was launched in the United States in 1994, in an effort to help spur and support fundamental, systemic change in the nation?s public schools. In the United States, Reinventing Education has evolved into a $35 million initiative encompassing 21 sites15 school districts and 6 states. As a global company, IBM is now expanding the program internationally to Ireland, Italy, Vietnam, the State of Rio in Brazil, and British Columbia in Canada.
Each of the projects is working to overcome a specific barrier to school reform, such as the length and structure of the school day and year; how learning is measured; and how language, math, and science are taught. Collectively, the projects address nearly every aspect of the education agendafrom home-school communications, to data management and analysis, classroom instruction, teacher training, and student assessment.
To each grant site, IBM is contributing more than just money; they are dedicating their world-renowned researchers, educational consultants, and technology. The goal of these partnerships is not to deliver a simple list of equipment, but instead, to join with educators and help them figure out how technology can solve existing problems or even lead to entirely new approaches to traditional school operations.
IBM Reinventing Education Grant Program
Step 1: Recruit and Organize Education, Business, Family, and Community Stakeholders
|
Identify/Recruit Stakeholders |
Recruitment Strategies |
Group/Individual |
Contact Information (name, title, affiliation) |
Contact Address |
Committed Member of Steering Committee |
|
Education |
|||||
|
Request for proposals |
District teams: superintendents, principals, teachers |
Signed letters of agreement |
|||
|
Family |
|||||
|
Trainings, opening of school events |
Parents |
Parents and volunteers |
|||
|
Business |
|||||
|
Trainings, opening of school events |
Volunteers |
Volunteers |
|||
|
Community |
|||||
|
Trainings, opening of school events |
Volunteers |
Volunteers |
|||
|
Other |
|||||
Step 2: Create a Vision for the Partnership
|
Potential Priority Areas |
Priority for Partners Rank 1-5 (high) |
Partnership Goals |
Order of Priorities (based on rankings) |
Customer(s) |
||||
|
Educators |
Family |
Business |
Community |
Other |
||||
|
Academic Areas |
||||||||
|
Reading |
The goal of Reinventing Education and our Partners is to help all students master the skills necessary to achieve high academic standards--whether they are moving on to college or the world of work. Thus, we are interested in raising the overall quality of the public education system by using innovative technologies to help spur and support fundamental systemic reform |
Systemic reform; higher student achievement; innovative uses of technology |
Students, |
|||||
|
Math |
||||||||
|
Preparing Students for College |
||||||||
|
School-to-Career |
||||||||
|
Other |
||||||||
|
Academic Supports |
||||||||
|
Technology |
While students must learn to use technology to succeed in work and life, Reinventing Education does not focus on technology proficiency as a skill students must master. Rather , we are interested in the ways that technology can be integrated into academic learning to help students master necessary skills. Family involvement is a critical component of our Reinventing Education grants. Numerous studies reveal that students whose parents are involved and active in their schools have greater chances for succeeding. We also know that parents want to participate in their children's learning, but need innovative ways to do so. |
Students, |
||||||
|
After School |
||||||||
|
Family Involvement |
||||||||
|
School-Based Management |
||||||||
|
Other |
||||||||
Step 3: Taking Stock Based on Partnership Vision
|
Priority Areas |
Alignment of Stakeholders? Goals Re. Education |
Where Are You Now? (assessment) |
Current Approaches Used to Achieve Goals |
Level(s) of Success |
|
Academic Areas |
||||
|
Reading |
Our district and state education partners share our commitment to helping students achieve at higher levels through the innovative use of technology. Each grant partnership hinges upon mutual signed agreements toward this end. |
Our first-round Reinventing Education grants were awarded on a staggered basis beginning in 1994. Each grant was designed to last for a period of 3-5 years. Our second-round grants were awarded in October 1997 for a 2-3 year period. We are still involved in each of our grant sites, either through ongoing project work or in a more limited partnership phase in which we are providing technical assistance on project scale-up. |
In each of our Reinventing Education sites, we are developing cutting-edge technologies designed to overcome specific barriers to school reform, such as the length and structure of the school day and year, how learning is measured, and how language, math and science are taught. Collectively, the projects address nearly every aspect of the education agenda -- from home-school communications, to data management and analysis, classroom instruction, teacher training, and student assessment. |
The Center for Children & Technology (CC&T), an arm of the not-for-profit Education Development Center, is in the midst of an independent , three-year, outcomes-based evaluation of Reinventing Education. Their initial findings show improvements in attendance, achievement, teachers' attitudes, and parent involvement. Importantly, CC&T also concluded that if IBM walked away from these sites tomorrow, many of our early projects, already institutionalized within the system, would be sustained and grow. |
|
Math |
||||
|
Preparing Students for College |
||||
|
School-to-Career |
||||
|
Other |
||||
|
Academic Supports |
||||
|
Technology |
Through each of our grants we are developing cutting-edge technologies to help students achieve at higher levels |
|||
|
Family Involvement |
In each grant site, we are inviting parents to join our projects as volunteers. In a number of sites, where parent involvement is a explicit goal of the project, we are training parents on new technologies. |
|||
Step 4: Set Up Steering Committee to Guide and Monitor the Partnership
|
Steering Committee Members |
Contact Information |
Priority Area(s) (interests/focus) |
|||
|
Title/Affiliation |
Address |
Phone/Fax |
|
||
|
Education |
|||||
|
In each Reinventing Education grant site, Letters of Agreement were signed with the district superintendent or the state commissioner of education. They in turn assigned a high-level grant project manager to work with an IBM project manager to help direct the grant work. Each grant site has a team of education and technical specialists assigned to work on the project. |
Higher student achievement; systemic reform; technology |
||||
Step 5: Collaboratively Set and Prioritize Short- and Long-Term Objectives
|
Goals |
Objectives |
|
|
Short-Term (semiannually) |
Long-Term (annually and beyond) |
|
|
Priority Area |
||
|
Higher student achievement |
Improve teacher/student attitudes, parent involvement, attendance, use of technology Customers; students, teachers, parents, business, community |
Higher academic achievement witnessed through test scores |
|
Priority Area |
||
|
Developing technology to be used in the project and eventually scaled up throughout the grant site in the service of higher student achievement |
Assessment of technology developed-- its ease of use, actual usage, integration in learning Customers; students, teachers, parents, business, community |
Successful scale-up throughout the grant site |
|
Priority Area |
||
|
Greater business involvement in education reform efforts |
Greater business/education acknowledgement of the importance of business/education partnerships and involvement in working on school reforms issues; leveraged grant moneys Customers; students, teachers, parents, business, community |
Greater business/education acknowledgement of the importance of business/education partnerships and involvement in working on school reforms issues; greater corporate philanthropic dollars contributed to system education reform projects |
Step 6: Create Action Plans and Teams Organized Around Priorities
|
Action Committees |
Committee Members (contact information) |
Committee Objectives |
Tasks/ Activities Assigned |
Time Frame |
Resources |
||
|
Requested |
Available |
Additional Needed |
|||||
|
Operations |
|||||||
|
Manage daily tasks |
Grant site and IBM project managers; overall supervision from district superintendent or state commissioner |
Technology development; training; Systemic reform |
Day-to-day management and project implementa-tion |
1st round grants: 3-5 years 2nd round grants: 2-3 years |
Grants range from $850,000 to $2 million |
$ for grant scale-up and ongoing systemic reform efforts |
|
|
Funding/managing resources |
|||||||
|
Monitoring quality of operations |
|||||||
|
Development |
|||||||
|
Recruiting partners |
Grant site project manager; IBM project manager |
Systemic reform |
Identify and secure other grant moneys |
Ongoing |
$ for grant scale-up and ongoing systemic reform efforts |
||
|
Recruiting resources |
|||||||
|
Allocating resources |
|||||||
|
Community |
|||||||
|
Marketing/PR |
Grant site and IBM project managers |
Systemic reform |
Hold school events; media placements |
Life of grant |
|||
|
Outreach to: home, school, community |
|||||||
|
Networking |
|||||||
|
Program Evaluation |
|||||||
|
Monitoring |
Center for Children & Technology |
Measure success of Reinventing Education in contributing to higher student achievement |
3-year, outcomes-based evaluation: site visits, interviews, surveys, data analysis. |
Three years |
Evaluation provided to each site independent of grant award |
||
Step 7: Implement Action Plans
|
Action Committee Objectives |
Activities/ |
Classification of Activity |
Activity Completion |
Resources Allocated |
Activities Accomplished |
Comments |
||||
|
Low (supple-mental) |
Medium (program-matic) |
High (strategic/ systemic) |
Expected |
Actual |
Yes |
No |
||||
|
Operations |
||||||||||
|
Day-to day management; technology development; training |
3 |
1st round grants: 3-5 years 2nd round grants: 2-3 years |
On target |
Grants range from $850,000 to $2 million |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Development |
||||||||||
|
Secure other monies |
3 |
1st round grants: 3-5 years 2nd round grants: 2-3 years ongoing |
On target |
Grants range from $850,000 to $2 million |
In each site, outside grant monies have been secured Ongoing |
|||||
|
Communication |
||||||||||
|
Publicize grant progress through school events and media placement |
3 |
1st round grants: 3-5 years 2nd round grants: 2-3 years |
On target |
Grants range from $850,000 to $2 million |
Ongoing |
|||||
Step 8: Measure and Report Progress
|
Short-Term |
Baseline |
Outcomes Achieved |
Check Points |
Next Steps |
Outcomes Achieved |
Check Points |
Next Steps |
|
Priority Area |
|||||||
|
Teachers' attitudes; attendance; parent involvement; technology development |
In February 1997, the Center for Children & Technology conducted an interim evaluation of our first-round sites |
CC&T found improvement in all short-term priority areas |
Site visits, interviews, data analysis |
Higher student achievement; systemic education reform Evaluation: in the midst of 3-year outcomes-based evaluation |
CC&T's initial findings show improvements in attendance, achievement, teachers' attitudes, and parent involvement. |
Site visits, interviews, surveys, data analysis |
CC&T will issue interim evaluation to enable programmatic improvements before publishing its final 3 year assessment |
Step 9: Review Annual Results and Plan for the Future
|
Short-Term |
Long-Term |
Baseline Measures |
Annual Outcomes |
Measurement |
Next Steps |
Action Committee Members (contact information) |
|
Priority Area |
||||||
|
Teachers' attitudes; attendance; parent involvement; technology development |
Higher student achievement; systemic reform |
Surveys, interviews, school attendance records, assessments of technology, student test scores |
3-year evaluation with interim progress reports |
CC&T evaluations |
Through ongoing feedback from CC&T, make necessary programmatic changes in each site to ensure ongoing progress |
CC&T; IBM overall management; district superintendent or state commissioners; IBM project managers; grant site project managers |
-###-
|
[ Snapshot #2 ] |
|
[ Snapshot #4 ] |