A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Goals 2000 State Subgrant Awards

............................................................................ STATE      |    INVOLVEMENT OF     |  APPLICATIONS  |       FUNDING         |            |      DISTRICTS        |                |                       | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Illinois   |  315 of 915 districts | 160 submitted  | $7.9 million requested|            |                       |  61 awarded    | $2.4 million awarded  | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Kansas     |  217 of 305 districts | 75 submitted   | $958,000 requested    |            |                       |  37 awarded    | $488,000 awarded      | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Kentucky   |a/ 52 of 176 districts | 102 submitted  | $2.0 million requested|             |                       |  38 awarded    | $817,000 awarded      | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Louisiana  |   59 of 66 districts  | 45 submitted   | $2.2 million requested|            |                       |  25 awarded    | $1.1 million awarded  | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Massachusetts  b/                  |     over       | $5.2 million requested|              |  185 of 350 districts | 100 submitted  | $1.1 million awarded  |            |                       |  38 awarded    |                       | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Michigan   |  552 of 624 districts | 108 submitted  | $11 million requested |            |                       |  24 awarded    | $2.1 million awarded  | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Oregon     |c/ 132 of 218 districts| 53 submitted   | $2.3 million requested|            |                       |  12 awarded    | $575,000 awarded      | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| Pennsylvania  302 of 501 districts | 181 submitted  |$13.3 million requested|            |                       |  58 awarded    | $2.2 million awarded  | ...........|.......................|................|.......................| 
* Those who submitted at least one application, either independently or as part of a consortium.

** Includes single-district and consortia applications submitted for professional development, pre-service teacher education, and local reform.

a/ In Kentucky, only those districts with a district improvement plan were eligible to apply for the subgrants. For this reason, the number of applications submitted may be lower than if every district had been eligible.

b/ In Massachusetts, the state believes that some districts that may have applied for funding decided to wait until the next round of applications when a larger pool of money is anticipated.

c/ In Oregon, the number of districts that applied and that are eligible reflects the new alignment of districts that is to occur on July 1, 1995.

NOTE: Districts could have submitted up to three different types of applications. Also, a district could be involved with a consortium of other districts in submitting an application.


-###-

[Supporting State and Local Reform] [Take Action for Children]