Archived Information
The State of Charter Schools Third-Year Report May 1999The Expanding Charter School Movement
State Charter Legislation
Newly Created And Pre-existing Charter Schools
| Charter schools have become an accepted part of the landscape of public education in 33 of the 50 states. The seven years since the 1991 passage of the first state's charter legislation have seen growth in both the number of states with charter legislation and in the number of charter schools opening in those states. While each state's law is unique, 34 states (including the District of Columbia) have legislation that authorizes an entity to grant charters to schools that frees them from some or all of the state's regulations in exchange for greater accountability for student outcomes. |
|
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
19981 |
|
Minnesota |
California |
Colorado |
Arizona |
Alaska |
Connecticut |
Mississippi |
Idaho |
|
|
Georgia |
Hawaii |
Arkansas |
District of Col. |
Nevada |
Missouri |
|
|
Massachusetts |
Kansas |
Delaware |
Florida |
Ohio |
Virginia |
|
|
Michigan |
|
New Hampshire |
Illinois |
Pennsylvania |
Utah |
|
|
New Mexico |
|
Louisiana |
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
Rhode Island |
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming |
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
| Number of charter schools starting in the year | Total schools closed as of September 19982 | New schools as of September 1998 | Total schools operating September 1998 | ||||||
| 1992-93 | 1993-94 | 1994-95 | 1995-96 | 1996-97 | 1997-983 | ||||
| Total | 2 | 34 | 64 | 154 | 178 | 289 | 32 | 361 | 1,050 |
| Minnesota | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 38 |
| California | 28 | 36 | 30 | 21 | 19 | 6 | 17 | 145 | |
| Colorado | 1 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 10 | 60 | |
| Michigan | 2 | 41 | 33 | 36 | 4 | 24 | 132 | ||
| New Mexico | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||
| Wisconsin | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 30 | ||
| Arizona | 47 | 58 | 45 | 14 | 44 | 180 | |||
| Georgia | 3 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 27 | |||
| Hawaii | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||
| Massachusetts | 15 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 34 | |||
| Alaska | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 17 | ||||
| Delaware | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| District of Columbia | 2 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 18 | ||||
| Florida | 5 | 28 | 1 | 38 | 70 | ||||
| Illinois | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 14 | ||||
| Louisiana | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | ||||
| Texas | 17 | 21 | 0 | 49 | 87 | ||||
| Connecticut | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16 | |||||
| Kansas | 1 | 0 | 14 | 15 | |||||
| New Jersey | 13 | 0 | 17 | 30 | |||||
| North Carolina | 34 | 1 | 26 | 59 | |||||
| Pennsylvania | 6 | 0 | 25 | 31 | |||||
| Rhode Island | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| South Carolina | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |||||
| Idaho | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| Mississippi | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Nevada | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Ohio | 15 | 15 | |||||||
NOTE: The Study reports the number of charters given to individual entities, though some of these charters may use space within another school or be connected to another school by some other arrangement. The number of charters listed above does not include the total number of school sites operating under a charter. Some charters, particularly in Arizona, run similar programs in several sites around the state. In those cases, the Study only counts the charter once. Several charters in California were awarded to districts or complexes of schools. Since each school within the group was previously a separate school, the Study counts each school as a separate charter school. Taking into account multiple school sites operating under one charter, the Study estimates that the total number of school sites operating under charters was 1,129 in September 1998.
1New York enacted charter legislation in December 1998 as this report was going to press.
2The column "Total Schools Closed as of September 1998" reflects the cumulative number of charter schools closed since 1992.
3 The number of schools that opened in the 1997-98 school year is slightly different for some states than the number of schools reported last year as of September 1997. The 1997-98 column includes several schools that opened later in the 1997-98 school year.
State authorizing legislation for charter schools establishes the state's charter school context; charter legislation differs dramatically from state to state. In many ways, the 34 states with legislation represent 34 different approaches to charter schools. Charter laws are not static during the 1998 legislative session, six states made significant changes in their laws. Charter laws differ on a number of characteristics; some of the key characteristics are highlighted here. |
| State | Who can grant charter | Charter creation status | Number of charter schools allowed | Duration of charter term | Collective bargaining allowed (% of schools 1) | |||
| Newly created | Pre-exisiting public | Pre-exisiting Private | ||||||
| Alaska | Local boards | Yes | Yes | No | 30 | 5 years | Yes | (100%) |
| Arizona | Local boards, State Board, and State Charter Board | Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit | 15 years | Yes | (2%) |
| Arkansas | State board | No | Yes | No | No limit | Yes | 3 Years | (57%) |
| California | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | No | 100
annually 2 |
5 Years | Yes | (57%) |
| Colorado | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | No | No limit | 5 Years | Yes | (8%) |
| Connecticut | Both Local boards
and state boards |
Yes | Yes | No | 243 | 5 Years | Yes | (18%) |
| Delaware | Local boards for
conversisons and state Board for newly created |
Yes | Yes | No | no limit | 3 Years | Yes | (0%) |
| District of Columbia | Local boards, State board, and State charter board + appeals | Yes | Yes | Yes | 20 annually | 15 Years | Yes | (0%) |
| Florida | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | No4 | Other limits5 | 3 years | Yes | (3%) |
| Newly created |
Pre- existing Public |
Pre- existing private |
Number of charter schools allowed | Duration of charter term | Collective Bargaining allowed (% of schools1) | |||
| Georgia | State board | Yes | Yes | No | No limit | 5 years | No | |
| Hawaii | State board | Yes | Yes | No | 25 | 4 years | Yes | (100%) |
| Idaho | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | No | 606 | 12 years | Yes | |
| Illinois | Local boards with State board review + appeals | Yes | Yes | No7 | 45 | 3-5 years | Yes | 0% |
| Kansas | Local boards | Yes | Yes | No | 15 | 3 years | Yes | 100% |
| Louisiana | Local boards and State board + appeals | Yes | Yes | No | 42 | 5 years | Yes | 0% |
| Massachusetts | Local boards for
conversions and State board for newly created |
Yes | Yes | No | 50 | 5 years | Yes | (0%) |
| Michigan | Local boards and IHEs | Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit | Up to 10 years | Yes | (5%) |
| Minnesota | Local boards and IHEs + appeals | Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit | 3 years | Yes | (8%) |
| Mississippi | Local boards and State board | No | Yes | No | 6 | 4 to 6 | Yes | |
| Missouri | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | Yes | Other limits8 | 5-10 years | Yes | |
| Nevada | Both Local boards and State board | Yes | Yes | No | Other limits9 | 3 years | Yes | |
| New Hampshire | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | No | 10 annually10 | 5 years | Yes | |
| New Jersey | State Commissioner | Yes | Yes | No | 1353 | 4 years | Yes | 0 |
| New Mexico | State board | No | Yes | No | 5 | 5 years | Yes | (75%) |
| North Carolina | Local boards, State board, and IHEs | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100 | 5 years | No | |
| Ohio | Local boards and State board | Yes | Yes | No | No limit | 3 years | Yes | |
| Pennsylvania | Local boards | Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit | Annual review | Yes | (0%) |
| Rhode Island | State board | Yes | Yes | No | 20 | 5 years | Yes | (100%) |
| South Carolina | Local boards + appeals | Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit | 3 years | No | |
| Texas | Local boards for
conversions and State board for newly created |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No limit11 | Specified in charter | Yes | (21%) |
| Utah | State board | Yes | Yes | No | 8 | 3 years | Yes | |
| Virginia | Local boards | Yes | Yes | No | 2 per district | 3 years | No | |
| Wisconsin | Local boards | Yes | Yes | Yes12 | No limit | Up to 5 years | Yes | (94%) |
| Wyoming | Local boards | Yes | Yes | No | No limit | No | Yes | |
1 The last column of the Table states whether collective bargaining is permitted in the state. The number in parentheses is the percentage of schools that have teachers who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. States with "Yes" without a percentage in parentheses had no operating schools during the 1997-98 school year.
2 In California, the cap was raised from 100 to 250 in 1997-98, with 100 additional charters allowed per year thereafter.
3 Charter legislation in Connecticut and New Jersey requires a legislative review (including a review of the number of charter schools allowed) in 1999 and 2000 respectively.
4 Although Florida's law does not allow private schools to apply directly for charter status, the state allows private schools to convert to charter status if they disband, reincorporate as a new organization with a new board, and enroll students in a public lottery.
5 The Florida legislation does not specify a statewide limit on the number of charter schools, the legislation does restrict the number of charters granted in each district based on district size. The effective cap for the state is 974 schools.
6 The Idaho legislation limits the annual number of charters to 12 with a statewide limit of 60.
7 Illinois state legislation stipulates that a private school must cease operation as a private school before applying for charter status.
8 Missouri law states that no more than 5 percent of the buildings used for instruction in a district may be converted to charter schools.
9 Nevada law limits the number of charters granted in each district based on district size, creating an effective cap of about 17 schools, with an exception for schools focusing on at-risk students.
10The New Hampshire legislation allows 10 charters annually until the year 2000.
11Texas legislation does not limit campus charters, but limits open-enrollment charters to 100 with no limit for charters serving at-risk students.
12Wisconsin's law allows the conversion of private schools only in Milwaukee.
|
State charter legislation determines whether charter schools can be created from scratch and whether previously public or private schools can convert to charter status. The states' charter laws differ greatly in this regard. Some states restrict charter status only to previously operating public schools while others allow newly created, pre-existing public, and pre-existing private schools to become charters. Throughout this report and our previous reports, we show that newly created, pre-existing public, and pre-existing private school conversions differ greatly in terms of school size, grade levels, the reasons that charter schools were started, the difficulties they encounter during implementation, and their autonomy. |
State charter legislation in all 24 states that had operating charter schools in the 1997-98 school year allowed for the conversion of public schools to charter status. Legislation in 22 states permitted the creation of newly created charter schools. Laws in eight states allowed for the conversion of private schools to charter status, but in two other states Florida and Illinois private schools must cease operation and be fully reconstituted if they are to convert into charter schools.
As of the 1997-98 school year, most charter schools 70 percent were newly created, while 19 percent were pre-existing public schools, and 11 percent were pre-existing private schools.
In Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas, one in five charter schools converted from private schools. Each of these states permitted the conversion of private schools into charter status and had more than 10 open charter schools in 1997-98.
The percentage of newly created charter schools has increased over time: 84 percent of the schools that opened in 1997-98 were newly-created in contrast to 53 percent of schools that opened in the 1994-95 school year or earlier.

| Number of Charter Schools | Newly created | Pre-existing public | Pre-existing private | |
| Total in 1997-98 | 619 | 434 | 120 | 65 |
| % of Total | 70.1% | 19.4% | 10.5% | |
| Open 1994-95 or earlier | 98 | 53.0% | 43.9% | 3.1% |
| Open 1995-96 | 143 | 64.3% | 21.0% | 14.7% |
| Open 1996-97 | 163 | 67.4% | 16.0% | 16.6% |
| Open 1997-98 | 215 | 83.7% | 9.8% | 6.5% |
| Total | Newly created | Pre-existing public | Pre-existing private | ||||
| All Schools | # | % | # | % | # | % | |
| Total | 619 | 434 | 70.1% | 120 | 19.4% | 65 | 10.5% |
| Alaska | 12 | 12 | 100% | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
| Arizona | 127 | 88 | 69.3% | 14 | 11.0% | 25 | 19.7% |
| California | 120 | 68 | 56.7% | 52 | 43.3% | NA | NA |
| Colorado | 49 | 45 | 91.8% | 4 | 8.2% | NA | NA |
| Connecticut | 11 | 11 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
| Delaware | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
| District of Columbia | 3 | 100.0% | 33.3% | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 33.3% |
| Florida | 31 | 29 | 93.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 21 | 6.5% |
| Georgia | 18 | NA | NA | 18 | 100.0% | NA | NA |
| Hawaii | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 100.0% | NA | NA |
| Illinois | 6 | 4 | 66.7% | 1 | 16.7% | 12 | 16.7% |
| Kansas | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 100.0% | NA | NA |
| Louisiana | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 1 | 16.7% | NA | NA |
| Massachusetts | 21 | 19 | 90.5% | 2 | 9.5% | NA | NA |
| Michigan | 45 | 68 | 71.6% | 7 | 7.4% | 20 | 21.1% |
| Minnesota | 25 | 22 | 88.0% | 2 | 8.0% | NA(13) | 4.0% |
| North Carolina | 27 | 21 | 77.8% | 1 | 3.7% | 5 | 18.5% |
| New Jersey | 6 | 6 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
| New Mexico | 4 | NA | NA | 4 | 100.0% | NA | NA |
| Pennsylvania | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 50.0% |
| Rhode Island | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 100.0% | NA | NA |
| South Carolina | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Texas | 29 | 19 | 65.5% | 3 | 10.3% | 7 | 24.1% |
| Wisconsin | 17 | 10 | 58.8% | 6 | 35.3% | 14 | 5.9% |
NOTE: These data rely on responses from the 619 open charter schools that responded to the telephone survey.
NOTE: NA indicates that the state's legislation did not allow for that type of charter school when the schools that responded to our 1998 survey received their charters. Several states have since changed their laws to allow more types of charter schools.
1 Although Florida's law does not allow private schools to apply directly for charter status, the state allows private schools to convert to charter status if they disband, reincorporate as a new organization with a new board, and enroll students in a public lottery.
2 Illinois state legislation stipulates that a private school must cease operation as a private school before applying for charter status.
3 One Minnesota private nonsectarian school converted to charter status. The Minnesota Attorney General has issued an opinion that casts doubt on whether other private schools can convert unless the developers had first tried to establish a newly created charter school and were denied.
4 Wisconsin's law allows for the conversion of private schools only in Milwaukee.
-###-