Archived Information

The State of Charter Schools Third-Year Report — May 1999

A. States and Charter Schools

The Expanding Charter School Movement
State Charter Legislation
Newly Created And Pre-existing Charter Schools


The Expanding Charter School Movement

Charter schools have become an accepted part of the landscape of public education in 33 of the 50 states. The seven years since the 1991 passage of the first state's charter legislation have seen growth in both the number of states with charter legislation and in the number of charter schools opening in those states. While each state's law is unique, 34 states (including the District of Columbia) have legislation that authorizes an entity to grant charters to schools that frees them from some or all of the state's regulations in exchange for greater accountability for student outcomes.

Estimated Number of Operational Charter Schools by Year

number chart


States With Charter Legislation By Year Passed as of September 1998

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

19981

Minnesota

California

Colorado

Arizona

Alaska

Connecticut

Mississippi

Idaho

 

 

Georgia

Hawaii

Arkansas

District of Col.

Nevada

Missouri

 

 

Massachusetts

Kansas

Delaware

Florida

Ohio

Virginia

 

 

Michigan

 

New Hampshire

Illinois

Pennsylvania

Utah

 

 

New Mexico

 

Louisiana

New Jersey

 

 

 

 

Wisconsin

 

Rhode Island

North Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wyoming

South Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Texas

 

 


Estimated Number of Charter Schools in Operation as of September 1998 by State
  Number of charter schools starting in the year Total schools closed as of September 19982 New schools as of September 1998 Total schools operating September 1998
  1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-983
Total 2 34 64 154 178 289 32 361 1,050
Minnesota 2 5 7 3 3 8 2 12 38
California   28 36 30 21 19 6 17 145
Colorado   1 13 10 8 19 1 10 60
Michigan     2 41 33 36 4 24 132
New Mexico     4 0 1 0 0 0 5
Wisconsin     2 3 6 7 0 12 30
Arizona       47 58 45 14 44 180
Georgia       3 9 9 1 7 27
Hawaii       2 0 0 0 0 2
Massachusetts       15 7 3 1 10 34
Alaska         2 13 0 2 17
Delaware         2 1 0 1 4
District of Columbia         2 1 1 16 18
Florida         5 28 1 38 70
Illinois         1 7 0 6 14
Louisiana         3 3 0 4 10
Texas         17 21 0 49 87
Connecticut           12 0 4 16
Kansas           1 0 14 15
New Jersey           13 0 17 30
North Carolina           34 1 26 59
Pennsylvania           6 0 25 31
Rhode Island           1 0 1 2
South Carolina           2 0 3 5
Idaho               2 2
Mississippi               1 1
Nevada               1 1
Ohio               15 15

NOTE: The Study reports the number of charters given to individual entities, though some of these charters may use space within another school or be connected to another school by some other arrangement. The number of charters listed above does not include the total number of school sites operating under a charter. Some charters, particularly in Arizona, run similar programs in several sites around the state. In those cases, the Study only counts the charter once. Several charters in California were awarded to districts or complexes of schools. Since each school within the group was previously a separate school, the Study counts each school as a separate charter school. Taking into account multiple school sites operating under one charter, the Study estimates that the total number of school sites operating under charters was 1,129 in September 1998.

1New York enacted charter legislation in December 1998 as this report was going to press.

2The column "Total Schools Closed as of September 1998" reflects the cumulative number of charter schools closed since 1992.

3 The number of schools that opened in the 1997-98 school year is slightly different for some states than the number of schools reported last year as of September 1997. The 1997-98 column includes several schools that opened later in the 1997-98 school year.



State Charter Legislation

State authorizing legislation for charter schools establishes the state's charter school context; charter legislation differs dramatically from state to state. In many ways, the 34 states with legislation represent 34 different approaches to charter schools. Charter laws are not static — during the 1998 legislative session, six states made significant changes in their laws. Charter laws differ on a number of characteristics; some of the key characteristics are highlighted here.


Key Dimensions of Charter Legislation
State Who can grant charter Charter creation status Number of charter schools allowed Duration of charter term Collective bargaining allowed (% of schools 1)
Newly created Pre-exisiting public Pre-exisiting Private
Alaska Local boards Yes Yes No 30 5 years Yes (100%)
Arizona Local boards, State Board, and State Charter Board Yes Yes Yes No limit 15 years Yes (2%)
Arkansas State board No Yes No No limit Yes 3 Years (57%)
California Local boards + appeals Yes Yes No 100
annually 2
5 Years Yes (57%)
Colorado Local boards + appeals Yes Yes No No limit 5 Years Yes (8%)
Connecticut Both Local boards
and state boards
Yes Yes No 243 5 Years Yes (18%)
Delaware Local boards for
conversisons and state
Board for newly created
Yes Yes No no limit 3 Years Yes (0%)
District of Columbia Local boards, State board, and State charter board + appeals Yes Yes Yes 20 annually 15 Years Yes (0%)
Florida Local boards + appeals Yes Yes No4 Other limits5 3 years Yes (3%)
Newly
created
Pre-
existing Public
Pre-
existing private
Number of charter schools allowed Duration of charter term Collective Bargaining allowed (% of schools1)
Georgia State board Yes Yes No No limit 5 years No  
Hawaii State board Yes Yes No 25 4 years Yes (100%)
Idaho Local boards + appeals Yes Yes No 606 12 years Yes  
Illinois Local boards with State board review + appeals Yes Yes No7 45 3-5 years Yes 0%
Kansas Local boards Yes Yes No 15 3 years Yes 100%
Louisiana Local boards and State board + appeals Yes Yes No 42 5 years Yes 0%
Massachusetts Local boards for
conversions and State
board for newly created
Yes Yes No 50 5 years Yes (0%)
Michigan Local boards and IHEs Yes Yes Yes No limit Up to 10 years Yes (5%)
Minnesota Local boards and IHEs + appeals Yes Yes Yes No limit 3 years Yes (8%)
Mississippi Local boards and State board No Yes No 6 4 to 6 Yes  
Missouri Local boards + appeals Yes Yes Yes Other limits8 5-10 years Yes  
Nevada Both Local boards and State board Yes Yes No Other limits9 3 years Yes  
New Hampshire Local boards + appeals Yes Yes No 10 annually10 5 years Yes  
New Jersey State Commissioner Yes Yes No 1353 4 years Yes 0
New Mexico State board No Yes No 5 5 years Yes (75%)
North Carolina Local boards, State board, and IHEs Yes Yes Yes 100 5 years No  
Ohio Local boards and State board Yes Yes No No limit 3 years Yes  
Pennsylvania Local boards Yes Yes Yes No limit Annual review Yes (0%)
Rhode Island State board Yes Yes No 20 5 years Yes (100%)
South Carolina Local boards + appeals Yes Yes Yes No limit 3 years No  
Texas Local boards for
conversions and State
board for newly created
Yes Yes Yes No limit11 Specified in charter Yes (21%)
Utah State board Yes Yes No 8 3 years Yes  
Virginia Local boards Yes Yes No 2 per district 3 years No  
Wisconsin Local boards Yes Yes Yes12 No limit Up to 5 years Yes (94%)
Wyoming Local boards Yes Yes No No limit No Yes  

1 The last column of the Table states whether collective bargaining is permitted in the state. The number in parentheses is the percentage of schools that have teachers who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. States with "Yes" without a percentage in parentheses had no operating schools during the 1997-98 school year.

2 In California, the cap was raised from 100 to 250 in 1997-98, with 100 additional charters allowed per year thereafter.

3 Charter legislation in Connecticut and New Jersey requires a legislative review (including a review of the number of charter schools allowed) in 1999 and 2000 respectively.

4 Although Florida's law does not allow private schools to apply directly for charter status, the state allows private schools to convert to charter status if they disband, reincorporate as a new organization with a new board, and enroll students in a public lottery.

5 The Florida legislation does not specify a statewide limit on the number of charter schools, the legislation does restrict the number of charters granted in each district based on district size. The effective cap for the state is 974 schools.

6 The Idaho legislation limits the annual number of charters to 12 with a statewide limit of 60.

7 Illinois state legislation stipulates that a private school must cease operation as a private school before applying for charter status.

8 Missouri law states that no more than 5 percent of the buildings used for instruction in a district may be converted to charter schools.

9 Nevada law limits the number of charters granted in each district based on district size, creating an effective cap of about 17 schools, with an exception for schools focusing on at-risk students.

10The New Hampshire legislation allows 10 charters annually until the year 2000.

11Texas legislation does not limit campus charters, but limits open-enrollment charters to 100 with no limit for charters serving at-risk students.

12Wisconsin's law allows the conversion of private schools only in Milwaukee.



Newly Created And Pre-Existing Charter Schools

State charter legislation determines whether charter schools can be created from scratch and whether previously public or private schools can convert to charter status. The states' charter laws differ greatly in this regard. Some states restrict charter status only to previously operating public schools while others allow newly created, pre-existing public, and pre-existing private schools to become charters. Throughout this report and our previous reports, we show that newly created, pre-existing public, and pre-existing private school conversions differ greatly in terms of school size, grade levels, the reasons that charter schools were started, the difficulties they encounter during implementation, and their autonomy.


Estimated Percentage of Charter Schools by Creation Status

pie graph


Estimated Number And Percentage of Newly Created And Pre-existing Charter Schools By Year of School Opening
  Number of Charter Schools Newly created Pre-existing public Pre-existing private
Total in 1997-98 619 434 120 65
% of Total   70.1% 19.4% 10.5%
Open 1994-95 or earlier 98 53.0% 43.9% 3.1%
Open 1995-96 143 64.3% 21.0% 14.7%
Open 1996-97 163 67.4% 16.0% 16.6%
Open 1997-98 215 83.7% 9.8% 6.5%

Estimated Number And Percentages of Charter Schools By Creation Status And State, Spring 1998
Total Newly created Pre-existing public Pre-existing private
All Schools # % # % # %
Total 619 434 70.1% 120 19.4% 65 10.5%
Alaska 12 12 100% 0 0 NA NA
Arizona 127 88 69.3% 14 11.0% 25 19.7%
California 120 68 56.7% 52 43.3% NA NA
Colorado 49 45 91.8% 4 8.2% NA NA
Connecticut 11 11 100.0% 0 0.0% NA NA
Delaware 3 3 100.0% 0 0.0% NA NA
District of Columbia 3 100.0% 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
Florida 31 29 93.5% 0 0.0% 21 6.5%
Georgia 18 NA NA 18 100.0% NA NA
Hawaii 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0% NA NA
Illinois 6 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 12 16.7%
Kansas 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0% NA NA
Louisiana 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7% NA NA
Massachusetts 21 19 90.5% 2 9.5% NA NA
Michigan 45 68 71.6% 7 7.4% 20 21.1%
Minnesota 25 22 88.0% 2 8.0% NA(13) 4.0%
North Carolina 27 21 77.8% 1 3.7% 5 18.5%
New Jersey 6 6 100.0% 0 0.0% NA NA
New Mexico 4 NA NA 4 100.0% NA NA
Pennsylvania 4 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0%
Rhode Island 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0% NA NA
South Carolina 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Texas 29 19 65.5% 3 10.3% 7 24.1%
Wisconsin 17 10 58.8% 6 35.3% 14 5.9%

NOTE: These data rely on responses from the 619 open charter schools that responded to the telephone survey.

NOTE: NA indicates that the state's legislation did not allow for that type of charter school when the schools that responded to our 1998 survey received their charters. Several states have since changed their laws to allow more types of charter schools.

1 Although Florida's law does not allow private schools to apply directly for charter status, the state allows private schools to convert to charter status if they disband, reincorporate as a new organization with a new board, and enroll students in a public lottery.

2 Illinois state legislation stipulates that a private school must cease operation as a private school before applying for charter status.

3 One Minnesota private nonsectarian school converted to charter status. The Minnesota Attorney General has issued an opinion that casts doubt on whether other private schools can convert unless the developers had first tried to establish a newly created charter school and were denied.

4 Wisconsin's law allows for the conversion of private schools only in Milwaukee.
-###-


[About This Report] [Table of Contents] [B. Basic Characteristics of Charter Schools]