Archived Information

References

American Federation of Teachers. (1996).

Charter school laws: Do they measure up? Washington, DC: Author.

Bierlein, L. & Fulton, M. (1996).

Emerging Issues in Charter School Financing. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

Buechler, M. (1996).

Charter schools: Legislation and results after four years. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center, School of Education, Indiana University.

Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. (1997).

Minnesota Charter School Evaluation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Charter schools and special ed law: An imperfect union. (1997, October 25).

The Special Educator, 12 (7) 1, 8-11.

Charter schools: Issues affecting access to federal funds. (September 16, 1997).

Hearings before the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Youth and Families, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Testimony of Cornelia M. Blanchette. (GAO/T-HEHS-97-216).

Charter schools: New models for public schools provides opportunities and challenges. (1995).

Report to the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services Education and Related Agencies, U.S. Senate. (GAO/HEHS Report No. 95-42).

Corwin, R., Carlos, L., Lagomarsino, B., & Scott, R. (May, 1996).

From paper to practice: Challenges facing a California charter school [On-line]. Available: wested.org/policy/pubs/pb_hm.htm.

Education Commission of the States. (1995).

Charter schools: What are they up to? Denver, CO: Author.

Finn, C.E., Manno, B.V., & Bierlein, L.A. (1996).

Charter schools in action: What have we learned? Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.

Fiore, T.A., & Cashman, E.R., (1998).

Review of charter school legislation provisions related to students with disabilities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Instruction (SAI 1998 3034).

Lange, C. (1997, March).

School choice, charter schools, and students with disabilities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Little Hoover Commission. (1996).

The charter movement: Education reform school by school. [On-line]. Available: lhc.ca.gov/lhcdir/138rp.html.

Manno, B., & Vanourek, G. (1997, October 27).

Norma Cantu strikes again. The Weekly Standard, 14-16.

McKinney, J.R. (1996).

Charter schools: A new barrier for children with disabilities. Educational Leadership, 54(2), 22-25.

McKinney, J.R., & Mead, J.F. (1996).

Law and policy in conflict: Including students with disabilities in parental-choice programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 107-141.

McLaughlin, M., Henderson, K., & Ullah, H. (1996).

Charter schools and students with disabilities. Alexandria, VA: Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform.

OCR finds disability bias at Boston charter school. (1997, September 17).

Special Education Report, 23(19), 3-4.

Powell, J., Blackorby, J., Marsh, J., Finnegan, K., & Anderson, L. (1997).

Evaluation of charter school effectiveness. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

RPP International & University of Minnesota. (1997).

A study of charter schools: First-year report. Emeryville, CA: Authors.

Szabo, J. M., & Gerber M. M. (1996).

Special education and the charter school movement. The Special Education Leadership Review, 3, 135-148.

Urahn, S., & Stewart, D. (1994).

Minnesota charter schools: A research report. Minneapolis, MN: House Research Department.

Vanourek, G., Manno, B., Finn, C., & Bierlein, L. (1997)

The Educational Impact of Charter Schools (Final Report, Part V). Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.

Ysseldyke, J., Lange, C., & Gorney, D. (1994).

Parents of students with disabilities and open enrollment: Characteristics and reasons for transfer. Exceptional Children, 60, 359-372.

[Summary]

[Appendix]