| CHARACTERISTIC | ||||
| Community Context | Border community, port of entry. | Low-income neighborhood in high-income district. | Port of entry, low income. | Inner-city magnet school drawing from a variety of neighborhoods. |
| Grade Span | ||||
| Total Enrollment | ||||
| Ethnicities (%) | Hispanic (91.8%)
African American (4.5%) White (3.7%) | Hispanic (85%)
White (12%) | Southeast Asian (44%)
Hispanic (38%) White (7%) African American (5%) | Hispanic (69%)
White (17%) African American (13%) |
| % LEP | ||||
| Languages (% of LEP Students) | Spanish (50%)
Hmong (22%) Vietnamese (16%) Lao (6%) | |||
| % Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch | (Economically Disadvantaged) | |||
| Background of LEP Students | An estimated 6% of the LEP students were recent immigrants; the majority of the remaining students were born in the U.S. Most late arrivals were literate in Spanish. | Most families were first generation immigrants; the children were born here to Mexican parents. | Some entering LEP students were born in the US, but most were recent immigrants, either political or economic refugees. | Some entering LEP students were born in the US, but most were recent immigrants. Approximately 30% were from Mexico; 25% were from Puerto Rico; 5% were from Cuba; and 27% percent were from other Latin American countries. |
| Actual Attendance | ||||
| Transiency/Mobility | Very stable | Medium to high mobility (30%) | Medium to high mobility | Stable (11.3%, 1992-93) |