A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

REFERENCES

Alternative Assessment Pilot Project. (1993). Charting the course toward instructionally sound assessment. San Francisco: Author.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Baker, E. L., & Stites, R. (1991). Trends in testing in the USA. The politics of curriculum and testing. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

Bond, L. A., Roeber, E. D., King, D., & Braskamp, D. C. (1995). The status of state student assessment programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers; Oakbrook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Borko, H., Flory, M., & Cumbo, K. (October, 1993). Teachers' ideas and practices about assessment and instruction. A case study of the effects of alternative assessment in instruction, student learning, and accountability practice. CSE Technical Report 366. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Bradley, A. (June 1, 1994). Requiem for a reform. Education Week, 21-25.

Burstein, L. (1989). Conceptual considerations in instructionally sensitive assessment. CSE Technical Report 333. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Cannell, J. J. (1989). How public educators cheat on standardized achievement tests. Albuquerque: Friends for Education.

Cannell, J. J. (1987). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in American's public schools: How all fifty states are above the national average. West Virginia: Friends for Education.

College Board News. (February, 1995). Prominent educators recommend the use of Pacesetter. 23(3), 1,2.

Council of Chief State School Officers and the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (1994). State student assessment programs database (1993-1994).

Education Daily. (September 13, 1995). Specter looks to amend Goals 2000 in spending bill. 28(13), 1,3.

Education Daily. (May 27, 1994). Goals 2000 will shape state, local school reform. Special Supplement. 27(102).

Falk, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (March, 1993). The Primary Language Record at P.S. 261: How assessment transforms teaching and learning. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.

Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Baker, E. L., & Whittaker, A. K. (July, 1993). Whose work is it? A question for the validity of large-scale portfolio assessment. CSE Technical Report 363. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Hansen, J. B., & Hathaway, W. E. (1991). A survey of more authentic assessment practices. Paper presented at the National Council for Measurement in Education/National Association of Test Directors (NCME/NATD) meeting in Chicago.

Hardy, R. (In press). Examining the costs of performance assessment. In M. B. Kane & R. Mitchell (Eds.). Implementing Performance Assessment: Promises, Problems, and Challenges. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C. D., Heath, T. M., & Wakai, S. T. (1994). A first look: Are claims for alternative assessment holding up? CSE Technical Report 391. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Herman, J. L. (1992). Accountability and alternative assessment: Research and development issues. CSE Technical Report 348. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Herman, J. L., & Golan, S. (1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning -another look. CSE Technical Report 334. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Hoff, D. (January 31, 1995). Goals panel looks to form its own standards council. Education Daily, 28(20).

Kentucky Institute for Education Research. (1995). An independent evaluation of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Executive Summary. Frankfort, KY: Author.

Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., McCaffrey, D., & Diebert, E. (1993). Can portfolios assess student performance and influence instruction? The 1991-1992 Vermont experience. CSE Technical Report 371. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Linn, R. L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges. CSE Technical Report 351. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Linn, R., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.

Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C. C., Remz, A. R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Research.

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mislevy, R. (1989). Foundations of a new test theory (Abstract). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mitchell, R. (1995). The promise of performance assessment: How to use backlash constructively. Paper presented at the San Francisco, CA, American Educational Research Association annual conference.

Mitchell, R. (1992). Testing for learning. New York: Free Press.

Mitchell, R. (April, 1992). Beyond the verbal confusion over tests. Education Week, 11(32).

Monk, D. H. (In press). Conceptualizing the costs of large-scale pupil performance assessment. In M. B. Kane & R. Mitchell (Eds.). Implementing Performance Assessment: Promises, Problems, and Challenges. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

National Center on Education and the Economy. (Undated). New Standards Project. Information Pamphlet. Washington, D.C.: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: Effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica: Rand.

Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

Office of Technology Assessment, U. S. Congress. (1992). Asking the right question: Testing in America. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

Olson, L. (February 1, 1995). Rules will allow district to set Title 1 measures. Education Week, 14(19).

Olson, L. (April 12, 1995). Standards times 50. Education Week, 14(29).

Olson, L. (February 8, 1995). Bills to scrap NESIC likely to hold sway. Education Week, 14(20).

Pechman, E. M. (1992). Use of standardized and alternative tests in the states. Washington, D.C.: Policy Study Associates.

Pelavin Associates and the Council of Chief State School Officers. (1991). Performance assessments in the states. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Resnick, L., & Simmons, W. (1993). Assessment as the catalyst of school reform. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 11-15.

Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. U. S. Department of Labor: Author.

Shepard, L. (1991). Will national tests improve student learning? Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3), 232-238.

Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace's school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Smith, M. L., Noble, A. J., Cabay, M., Heinecke, W., Junker, M. S., & Saffron, Y. (July, 1994). What happens when the test mandate changes? Results of a multiple case study. CSE Technical Report 380. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Smith, M. & O'Day, J. (1990). Systemic school reform. Politics of Education Yearbook.

Wiley, D., & Haertel, H. (1992). Extended assessment tasks: Purposes, definitions, scoring, and accuracy. Paper prepared for the California Assessment Program.

Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Towards more authentic and equitable assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-713.

Wiggins, G. (1991). Standards, not standardization evoking quality student work. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 18-25.

Wolf, D. P., & Pistone, N. (1991). Taking full measure: Rethinking assessment through the arts. New York: College Board.

Wolf, D. P., & Pistone, N. (1989). Portfolio assessment, sampling student work. Educational Leadership, 46(7).

-###-

[Chapter 8:Assessment Reform: Findings and Implications Part 2 of 2] [Appendix]