Conclusion
POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE PLANS
Developing and implementing a national education information network will require examination of many issues. Model organizational structures and best practices for collaborative partnerships have been explored by Patricia Libutti; roles, responsibilities and incentives for potential partners were addressed in Jo Ann Carr's paper; technological challenges and opportunities have been examined by Don Ely; and, access and equity issues in providing effective educational information services were discussed by John D'Amicantonio. Each paper recommends how to best address specific issues within the proposed education information network. However, these papers all acknowledge the limitations of technology in meeting the needs of all constituents. Alternative plans that will address those concerns include maintaining in-person contacts, telephone and mail accessibility, and resources that will serve the needs of special populations. Outsourcing some of the proposed projects, such as development of a listserv, Web site, or master directory of education information providers, is another potential option. Any alternative proposals must retain the stated priority of serving the needs of the greatest number with the most accessible resources, however. Alternative proposals which focus only on small categories of users, without an overarching mechanism for linking to a broader array of resources and services will not be acceptable. Once again, the primary thrust of implementing USEIN must be to establish operating procedures and bylaws from which all other developments can flow. Of major importance once the network has been established is to implement regular evaluation of its functionality. Reviews similar to those undertaken for other Department programs will be required every 2-5 years.
Conclusion