Change in Total Number Served from Chapter 1 School Year Previous Year Total Served Part B (SOP) (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------- 1976-77 -- 3,708,601 3,484,756 223,832 1977-78 1.8 3,777,286 3,484,756 222,732 1978-79 3.8 3,919,073 3,554,554 225,480 1979-80 3.0 4,036,219 3,693,593 233,744 1980-81 3.5 4,177,689 3,802,475 243,708 1981-82 1.3 4,233,282 3,933,981 242,936 1982-83 1.5 4,298,327 4,052,595 245,732 1983-84 1.0 4,341,399 4,094,108 247,291 1984-85b/ 0.5 4,363,031 4,113,312 249,719 1985-86 0.2 4,370,244 4,121,104 249,140 1986-87 1.2 4,421,601 4,166,692 254,909 1987-88 1.4 4,485,702 4,226,504 259,198 1988-89 1.8 4,568,063 4,305,690 262,373 1989-90 2.4 4,675,619 4,411,681 263,938 1990-91 2.8 4,807,441 4,547,368 260,073 1991-92 3.7 4,986,043 4,714,087 271,956 1992-93 3.4 5,155,950 4,886,411 269,509 1993-94 4.2 5,373,077 5,095,514 277,563
a/ From 1988-89 to the present, these numbers include children 3 through 21 years of age counted under Part B and children from birth to age 21 counted under Chapter 1 (SOP).Prior to 1988-89, children from birth through age 20 were served under Chapter 1 (SOP). The totals do not include infants and toddlers from birth through age 2 served under Part H who were not served under the Chapter 1 (SOP) program.
b/ Beginning in 1984-85, the number of children with disabilities reported for the most recent year reflects revisions to State data received by the Office of Special Education Programs between the July 1 grant award date and October 1. Updates received from States for previous years are included, so totals may not match those reported in previous Annual Reports to Congress. Before 1984-85, Reports provided data as of the grant award date.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
Respectively, Part B and Chapter 1 (SOP) programs served 209,073 and 8,054 more children and youth in 1993-94. The Chapter 1 (SOP) increase contrasts with the 2,447 decrease that occurred between 1991-92 and 1992-93. However, this increase represents the sum of two very different trends that occurred within the Chapter 1 (SOP) program--namely, a significant increase in the number of birth through age 2 children served and a decrease in the number of those served in all other age groups.The number of birth through age 2 children served in Chapter 1 (SOP) programs increased by 25.1 percent (18,757) from 74,830 to 93,587. The number of students age 3 through 21 decreased by 10,703 or 5.5 percent, from 194,679 to 183,976 (see table 1.4).
Percent of Number of Children Change Total Birth Age 1992-93 1993-94 Number Percent through 21
------------------------------------------------------------------ 0-2 74,830 93,587 18,757 25.1 33.7 3-5 16,372 16,246 -126 -0.8 5.9 6-11 71,727 66,265 -5,462 -7.6 23.9 12-17 81,501 78,351 -3,150 -3.9 28.2 18-21 25,079 23,114 -1,965 -7.8 8.3 0-21 269,509 277,563 8,054 3.0 100.0
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
The Part B and Chapter 1 (SOP) programs differed with regard to the number of students served and the relative proportions of students served across the various disability categories. Of the total number of children and youth from birth through age 21 served during the 1993-94 school year, 5,095,514 (94.8 percent) were served under Part B and 277,563 (5.2 percent) were served under Chapter 1 (SOP).
Although over 96 percent of all students age 6 through 21 were served under Part B, there is considerable variation in the distribution of students by disability category across the two programs. On one hand, almost all students (over 90 percent) with speech or language impairments, learning disabilities, other health impairments, serious emotional impairments, mental retardation, and orthopedic impairments were served under Part B. On the other hand, a relatively large percentage of students with deaf-blindness (38.7 percent), hearing impairments (25.1 percent), visual impairments (21.4 percent), traumatic brain injury (20.7 percent), and autism (20.6 percent) were served in Chapter 1 (SOP). This difference may be attributed to the relatively larger percentage of students with moderate and severe disabilities that have historically been served under the Chapter 1 (SOP) program.
Percent of Number of Children Change Total Birth Age 1992-93 1993-94 Number Percent through 21
------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-2a/ 4,830 93,587 18,757 25.1 1.7 3-5 455,529 493,425 37,896 8.3 9.2 6-11 2,399,917 2,464,237 64,320 2.7 45.9 12-17 1,990,096 2,079,475 89,379 4.5 38.7 18-21 235,578 242,353 6,775 2.9 4.5 0-21 5,155,950 5,373,077 217,127 4.2 100.0
a/ All of the infants and toddlers age birth through two were served under Chapter 1 (SOP).
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
The increase in the number of children served from birth through age 2 can be attributed partly to the expansion of early intervention programs. One reason for the decrease in the number of school-age children served under Chapter 1 (SOP) is that more States were serving students under Part B. States maintain that the funding differential between the two programs was no longer significant enough to justify separate administrative programs. Another reason that States may have served more students under Part B is that they anticipated the merger of the Part B and Chapter 1 (SOP) programs.
Students with specific learning disabilities continue to account for more than half of all students with disabilities (51.1 percent). During the 1993-94 school year, 2,444,020 students with specific learning disabilities were served under Part B and Chapter 1 (SOP), 3.3 percent (77,526) more than in 1992-93. Students with speech or language impairments (21.1 percent), mental retardation (11.6 percent), and serious emotional disturbance (8.7 percent) make up an additional 41.4 percent of all students with disabilities age 6 through 21.
The increases within several disability categories were proportionately greater than the 3.5 percent increase across all categories (see table 1.6). The largest increase occurred in the students with traumatic brain injury category, which increased from 3,960 to 5,295 (33.7 percent). Significant increases also occurred in the categories of students with other health impairments (from 66,063 to 83,279, or 26.1 percent) and autism (from 15,580 to 18,903, or 21.3 percent). Increases also occurred in other categories:orthopedic impairments (4,028, or 7.7 percent), multiple disabilities (6,467, or 6.3 percent), hearing impairments (3,633 or 6.0 percent), and visual impairments (1,391, or 5.9 percent).
Total Change Disability 1992-93 1993-94 Number Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------- Specific learning disabilities 2,366,494 2,444,020 77,526 3.3 Speech or language impairments 998,049 1,009,379 11,330 1.1 Mental retardation 532,365 553,992 21,627 4.1 Serious emotional disturbance 401,659 414,279 12,620 3.1 Multiple disabilities 103,279 109,746 6,467 6.3 Hearing impairments 60,616 64,249 3,633 6.0 Orthopedic impairments 52,588 56,616 4,028 7.7 Other health impairments 66,063 83,279 17,216 26.1 Visual impairments 23,544 24,935 1,391 5.9 Autism 15,580 18,903 3,323 21.3 Deaf-blindnessa/ 1,394 1,372 -22 -1.6 Traumatic brain injury 3,960 5,295 1,335 33.7 All disabilities 4,625,591 4,786,065 160,474 3.5
a/ 9,783 persons between the ages of birth to 21 have been identified by coordinators of the State and Multi-State Services for Children with Deaf-Blindness as required under [20 U.S.C 1422(c)(1) and (2)].See Appendix E.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
The size of the increases in the number of students with autism or traumatic brain injury is probably related to the fact that these reporting categories were only recently established.The 1993-94 school year was only the second year States were required to report the student count in these categories. Also, many States reported that these increases occurred because enhanced technical assistance enabled districts to improve their ability to report students in these two Federal disability categories.
The study also assessed the extent to which changes in classification criteria, either in other disability categories or within the other health impairments category, affected the increases in the other health impairments category. The majority of the respondents reported that their State did not experience a decrease in another disability category that could have been attributed to a shift in classification of students into the other health impairments category. Only two respondents reported increases in other specific health impairments (such as students with medically fragile conditions, fetal alcohol syndrome, respiratory problems, or students that abused drugs or alcohol) that could have contributed to the increase.
Finally, the eight respondents were asked if recent increases in the number of students with other health impairments were due to changes in the State or local service configurations. Only four respondents indicated that there had been substantive changes in their State's service configurations at either the State or local level. The only change specifically related to students with ADD was the distribution of improved instructions to local districts on how to better serve students with ADD. The most common service configuration change reported was the increased use of Medicaid funding, which has resulted in some increases in health service provision.
Researchers and practitioners have heatedly debated the causes for these increases. Hallahan (1992) speculates that two primary factors contribute to the documented increases in the number of students with specific learning disabilities. First, the field of learning disabilities is relatively new, and with each successive year, school personnel and parents become more adept at recognizing children with specific learning disabilities. It follows that the number of students identified will level off as nearly all students are identified. Second, Hallahan cites changes in social/cultural supports over the past 20 years as well as higher levels of poverty and substance abuse among pregnant women, coupled with diminishing social support, as causes for the increased prevalence of specific learning disabilities. Hallahan notes that "of all the disability categories, learning disabilities is one of the most sensitive barometers of the biomedical status of children and the psychosocial climate in which they live" (p. 524). Variations in assessment practices may also contribute to State-to-State and year-to-year fluctuations in the rate at which students are identified with specific learning disabilities.