Table 1.1 summarizes the amount of Part B funding appropriated to States for FY 1977 through FY 1994. Funds appropriated under Part B have increased steadily from $251,770,000 in FY 1977 to $2,149,686,000 in FY 1994. During the same period, the average per child Part B allocation increased from $71 to $413.
Appropriation Part B Per child Year State Grants a/ Allocation
1977 $ 251,770,000 $ 71 1978 566,030,000 156 1979 804,000,000 215 1980 874,190,000 227 1981 874,500,000 219 1982 931,008,000 230 1983 1,017,900,000 248 1984 1,068,875,000 258 1985 1,135,145,000 272 1986 1,163,282,000 279 1987 1,338,000,000 316 1988 1,431,737,000 332 1989 1,475,449,000 336 1990 1,542,610,000 343 1991 1,854,186,000 400 1992 1,976,095,000 410 1993 2,052,730,000 411 1994 2,149,686,000 413
a/These figures include amounts appropriated to Micronesia and the Marshall Islands. The data in Appendix Table AG1 do not include these figures.
Source: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
At least 75 percent of a State's Part B funds must be distributed to local educational agencies (LEAs) and intermediate educational units (IEUs) to assist in the education of students with disabilities (34 CFR 300. 706). The LEAs and IEUs are required to ensure that these funds do not supplant State and local expenditures, and that they are used for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to students with disabilities. SEAs are permitted to set aside up to 25 percent of the Part B grant for their own use. Of these set-aside funds, States may use up to 5 percent of the grant, or $450,000, whichever is greater, for administrative costs. States may use the remaining 20 percent of the set-aside funds for two purposes: providing direct and support services for children and youth with disabilities or paying the administrative costs for monitoring and compliance investigations, to the extent that such administrative costs exceed the costs of administration incurred during FY 1985.
Fiscal Year Chapter 1 (SOP) National Average State Grants Per child Allocation a/
1966 $ 12,467,000 $ 243 1967 15,078,000 182 1968 24,747,000 283 1969 29,781,000 309 1970 37,483,000 339 1971 46,130,000 379 1972 56,381,000 428 1973 75,962,000 481 1974 85,778,000 515 1975b/ 183,733,000 1,028 1976 111,433,000 592 1977 121,591,000 604 1978 132,492,000 592 1979 143,353,000 635 1980 145,000,000 620 1981 152,625,000 626 1982 146,520,000 604 1983 146,520,000 596 1984 146,520,000 593 1985 150,170,000 587 1986 143,713,000 572 1987 150,170,000 588 1988 151,269,000 578 1989 148,200,000 557 1990 146,389,000 545 1991 148,859,000 561 1992 143,000,000 524 1993 126,393,696 432 1994 116,878,000 387
a/Actual per child allocations vary from State to State.
b/The Chapter 1 (SOP) funds for FY 1966-74 were for use in the fiscal year of appropriation. However, beginning in FY 1975, funds were to be used in the next fiscal year. As a result, the appropriation in FY 1975 was for funds to be used in both FY 1975 and FY 1976.
Source: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS).
This program was not reauthorized under the Improving America's Schools Act that reauthorized ESEA. Beginning July 1, 1995, funding for services to all eligible children and youth age 3 through 21 will be provided under IDEA, Part B.
In November 1994, NASDSE sent a survey to State directors of special education in all 50 States. The first part of the survey listed the direct and support activities States reported funding with set-aside monies in the 1991 study. Space was available to add additional funding categories, if appropriate. Respondents were asked to indicate which of these activities were funded with the 1992 Part B grant award and to estimate the percentage of set-aside funds used for each activity. Six general questions were asked in the second part of the survey. These questions were related to the use of set-aside funds for reform and restructuring activities and to their use as "flow through" funds for local school systems. Of the 50 directors surveyed, 42 (84 percent) responded to NASDSE's request for information.
An analysis of the responses to the first part of the survey showed that SEAs continue to use set-aside funds to maintain the 23 direct and/or support activities identified in the 1991 study. Nine categories were reported as being used by at least half of the SEAs responding. These nine categories were:
Regarding the use of Part B set-aside monies as "flow through" funds, most of the States responding (31 of 42) indicated "flowing through" more than the required 75 percent of Part B dollars to local school systems. However, of the 31 States that have increased their "flow through," only 5 were mandated by State law or regulations to do so.
In summary, States report using Part B set-aside funds in a variety of ways that support the implementation of Part B. Both the ways that States use funds and the proportion of funds used for any particular activity vary considerably. Based on the results of the survey, SEAs appear to be using Part B set-aside funds to assist local school systems in providing services required by Part B.