School-based management (SBM) is often in the news. In practice, SBM varies from school to school, but generally it gives increased budgeting, curriculum, and staffing responsibilities to principals and teachers or to parents and community members in conjunction with school staff. The influence each group has varies from school to school, but the goal remains the same: to improve children's schooling.
Implicit in this call for greater school-level influence is the belief that those closest to the children--principals, teachers, parents, and community members--know best what is needed to improve their schools. The purpose of this report is to examine where decision making now occurs.
The Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) provides information on where decisions are made for three SBM areas: establishing curriculum, hiring new full-time teachers, and setting discipline policy. The 1987-88 School Administrator Questionnaire collected information from 8,580 public school principals across the country.
Principals were asked how much they thought the school district, principal, and teachers actually influenced decisions on establishing curriculum, hiring new full-time teachers, and setting discipline policy. The principals' answers are categorized according to which of the three groups--district, principal, or teachers--they believed most influenced these decisions.
The data provided are principal's reports of conditions and are not based on independent observations of actual making. Also, many differences observed between different community types may be due to district and school sizes, both of which tend to be larger in large cities.
Principals' Views on Who Has the Most Influence Over Selected School Decisions
-------------------------------------------------------------- Type of school decision -------------------------------------------- Staff Establishing Hiring new Setting most curriculum full-time discipline responsible teachers policy --------------------------------------------------------------- (Percentage of principals responding) Total 100 100 100 School district 33 28 24 Teachers 12 1 1 Principals 11 49 23 Principals & teachers 19 2 18 District & teachers 3 0 0 District & principal 6 18 15 All three 15 2 17NOTE: Figures may not total 100 because of rounding.
Teachers, on the other hand, were not seen having primary responsibility over any of these areas. Only 12 percent of principals thought teachers were primarily responsible for establishing curriculum, and only 1 percent said teachers had primary responsibility for hiring new teachers or setting discipline policy.
Teachers were seen having little primary responsibility for hiring new colleagues.
Again, teachers were not seen having primary responsibility for setting policy, but working with the principals (18 percent) or with the principals and district (17 percent).
School principals viewed school district staff in very large cities as being firmly in control.
Only a small minority of school principals in very large cities believed they alone (4 percent), their teachers (5 percent), or they and their teachers (9 percent) were primarily responsible for making decisions on curriculum. They reported somewhat more control over hiring teachers and setting discipline policy, but the district still was the primary influence.
Percentage of Principals Agreeing that the School District Has the Most Influence Over Establishing Curriculum
Type
---- Very large city ==================================> 62% Large city ================================> 57% Medium city =======================> 45% Suburb-very large city ====================> 39% Suburb-large city ===================> 37% Suburb-medium city ================> 30% Small city ===============> 27% Rural/farming =============> 22% |-------------|-------------|-------------| 0 25 50 75 Percent
Percentage of Principals Agreeing that the School District Has the Most Influence Over Hiring New Full-Time Teachers
Type
---- Very large city ==================================> 61% Large city =======================> 45% Medium city =================> 33% Suburb-very large city =============> 24% Suburb-large city ============> 21% Suburb-medium city =============> 23% Small city ============> 22% Rural/farming =============> 24% |-------------|-------------|-------------| 0 25 50 75 Percent
Percentage of Principals Agreeing that the School District Has the Most Influence Over Setting School Discipline
Type
---- Very large city ======================> 40% Large city =======================> 42% Medium city =================> 29% Suburb-very large city ===============> 26% Suburb-large city ============> 22% Suburb-medium city =============> 24% Small city ============> 22% Rural/farming ==========> 18% |-------------|-------------|-------------| 0 25 50 75 Percent
The situation in small cities and towns, where schools are less likely to be part of a school district with a large centralized bureaucracy, is much different.
Principals in small towns and cities are much more likely to report they or their teachers are responsible for decisions about curriculum, hiring, and discipline.
In general, the larger the city in which the school is located, the less the amount of control reported by school principals.
Principals' Views on Who Has the Most Influence Over Establishing Curriculum, Hiring Full-Time Teachers, and Setting Discipline Policy, by Type of Decision and Community
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Entity said to have the most influence Community --------------------------------------------------------------- type Tchrs & Dist. & School Prin- Prin- Dist. & Prin- All district Teachers cipal cipal Teachers cipal three Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ESTABLISHING CURRICULUM Total 33 12 11 19 3 6 15 100 Very Large city 62 5 4 9 2 7 12 100 Large city 57 6 4 10 4 6 12 100 Medium city 45 11 7 11 4 5 17 100 Suburb of very large city 39 14 10 16 4 5 13 100 Suburb of large city 37 12 7 18 4 5 17 100 Suburb of medium city 30 11 10 21 3 6 19 100 Small city or town 27 14 13 21 3 7 16 100 Rural/farming 22 13 16 25 2 7 15 100 HIRING NEW FULL-TIME TEACHERS Total 28 1 49 2 0 18 2 100 Very large city 62 - 20 1 - 10 7 100 Large city 45 1 32 2 1 16 3 100 Medium city 33 1 46 3 - 15 2 100 Suburb of very large city 24 - 56 2 - 16 1 100 Suburb of large city 21 0 57 3 - 18 2 100 Suburb of medium city 23 1 54 2 - 17 3 100 Small city or town 22 1 53 2 - 20 2 100 Rural/farming 24 0 52 2 0 20 2 100 SETTING DISCIPLINE POLICY Total 25 1 23 18 0 15 17 100 Very large city 40 2 15 13 1 14 15 100 Large city 42 1 13 15 1 13 15 100 Medium city 29 1 18 19 1 14 18 100 Suburb of very large city 26 2 20 19 - 17 16 100 Suburb of large city 22 1 26 19 - 14 18 100 Suburb of medium city 24 - 23 20 - 15 17 100 Small city or town 22 2 26 20 0 14 17 100 Rural/farming 18 1 27 18 0 18 17 100 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTES:
(1) Figures may not total 100 because of rounding.
(2) The total contains a small number of schools on military bases or Indian reservations. There were too few of these schools to include them as separate categories.
(3) Very large cities are those with over 500,000 people, large cities have 100,000 to 500,000 people, mediumcities have 50,000 to 100,000 people, and small cities and towns have fewer than 50,000 people and in addition are not suburbs of larger cities.
(4)--indicates that there were too few cases for analysis.
(2) Tables of standard errors and numbers of cases are available in a separate report. Write to the address above to obtain this report.
-###-