A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Model Strategies in Bilingual Education: Professional Development - 1995

ESOL Inservice Project

Dade County Public Schools
Miami, Florida

Goals and Context

Of the 300,000 students in the Dade County Public School (DCPS) district, which encompasses Miami and its suburbs, about 45,000 have limited English proficiency (LEP). A large majority of these students are Spanish-speaking; the second largest contingent is Haitian, but dozens of other primary languages are spoken. In DCPS and the rest of the state, periodic clashes occur between those who advocate an English-only approach to instruction and those who support use of primary languages to ensure students' mastery of the core curriculum. About 10 years ago, the Dade County Council passed an English-only ordinance prohibiting the use of any other language besides English for official government business. Although the measure was largely symbolic and was recently repealed, it codified an anti-immigrant sentiment that had been brewing for some time and that still affects relations among ethnic groups. In the absence of supportive public policy, schools serving LEP students throughout the state sometimes adopted instructional approaches ill-suited to their students' needs; consequently, students' academic progress suffered.

In the summer of 1989, a group of eight plaintiffs--known as the Multicultural Education Training and Advocacy (META) Project--informed the state education agency of its intent to sue on behalf of underserved students with limited English proficiency. The suit was based on the state's failure to establish statewide standards and guidelines for the provision of services to these students. META and the state negotiated an agreement (called the consent decree) that prescribed a four-part remedy: (1) identifying, assessing, and monitoring the progress of language minority students; (2) providing LEP students with access to teachers trained to meet their needs; (3) requiring teachers to obtain appropriate training and certification; and (4) evaluating program effectiveness. In practical terms, the consent decree requires all teachers working with any LEP student to participate in courses related to teaching English to speakers of other languages (ESOL) and, in some cases, to earn formal bilingual or ESOL credentials. To meet the terms of the decree, DCPS and other Florida districts were faced with the responsibility for setting up immediate training for a large number of teachers and winning the teachers' cooperation in this endeavor.

DCPS saw the decree as an opportunity to expand existing professional development activities, and, as soon as the terms were announced, the director of Bilingual/Foreign Language Education and Training at DCPS began developing a plan. Her commitment and vigor arose from first-hand experience learning English as a second language. Through her efforts and those of her colleagues, the DCPS's Bureau of Human Resource Development created a program of inservice training that allows teachers who need ESOL endorsement, desire professional growth, or want recertification to enroll in the necessary courses during times when they are not teaching.

Project Description

Participants. All teachers providing instruction to students with limited English proficiency must attend training sessions. This includes basic ESL teachers with and without prior experience, primary language teachers (other than English), and teachers of basic and non-basic subject areas with LEP students in their classes. By May 1993, DCPS had determined that the terms of the consent decree prescribed additional training for about 15,000 teachers, one-third of its teaching staff in grades preK-12. Of these, 2,136 are basic ESOL teachers; 8,203 teach core subjects in English to LEP students; 2,303 teach core subjects in primary languages; and 9,283 teach LEP students in other subjects. Most teachers work in schools that serve culturally and economically diverse students. (The LEP immigrant student population includes economic and political refugees and members of prosperous families from the international business community.)

Courses. Teachers are able to meet their training requirements by taking courses offered several times throughout the year to accommodate their schedules. Courses are offered in afternoons and evenings during the school year, all day Saturday for seven weeks, and in summer institutes that run for seven consecutive seven-hour weekdays in June and July. All classes meet at schools or at the Dade County Training Center. During the seven-day summer sessions, any participant absent more than one day is automatically dropped from the course; two absences are allowed in afternoon and evening courses. Teachers may take up to three courses in the summer session.

The eight courses offered are: Methods of Teaching ESOL, ESOL Curriculum and Materials Development, Cross Cultural Communication and Understanding, Applied Linguistics, Testing and Evaluation of ESOL, ESOL Issues and Strategies, Home Language Strategies, and Issues and Strategies for LEP Students. Courses consist of combinations of lecture, films, discussion, homework, role-plays, and small-group activities. In addition, trainees apply new ideas in lessons that their supervisors observe and assess, and they write reviews of current articles or publications on second-language learning and methods.

Requirements. All teachers who have LEP students in their classrooms must acquire a certain number of Master Plan Points (MPPs) within six years. The number of points and the timeline for completion depend on their teaching assignment (for example, ESOL or content area) and prior experience. Points are achieved by completing the courses offered through the program. Basic ESOL teachers who provide students with LEP primary language arts instruction must take five courses of training. Basic ESOL teachers with prior experiences need only take one course (any one other than Applied Linguistics). Primary language teachers who teach LEP students basic subjects in their native language must take Home Language Strategies. Teachers of other non-basic subject areas must take a mini-course called Issues/Strategies for Teaching LEP Students.

Although the state did not require districts to begin training until July 1991, DCPS's bilingual/ESL program director quickly began training assistant principals for 87 school sites throughout the district. These administrators then trained teachers in their own schools.

Institutional collaboration. Today instructors from the district and the Region 5 Multifunctional Resource Center, located at Florida Atlantic University, provide most of the training for the program. They offer courses in use of cross-cultural ESOL materials, curriculum development, applied linguistics, and assessment. Other instructors include certified ESOL teachers with masters degrees. Almost all instructors and staff are bilingual.

Accountability. Using a powerful management information system, the district monitors the training status of each teacher with LEP students. Whenever a student with limited English proficiency--as identified by an oral interview and a standardized test--is assigned to a teacher's classroom, that information is entered into the computer system. Monitors review the inservice background of the teacher for compliance with the terms of the consent decree. If the teacher's training status differs from META requirements for the student's placement, the school loses district support for the teacher's position. Thus, schools and teachers have a strong incentive to take the requirements seriously.

Project Outcomes

By May 1993, more than 9,000 teachers had completed the course in ESOL Issues and Strategies, and 3,000 had completed the course Issues and Strategies for LEP students. Several hundred teachers had completed one or more of the other courses.

The director reports that many changes are occurring in classrooms of teachers who have gone through the training. Most importantly, she notes, many teachers are exercising initiative to find better ways to reach their language minority students and, sometimes, to reduce reliance on traditional methods and texts. In content areas, she sees more teachers using peer tutoring and heterogeneous grouping to help students with limited English proficiency. She has also noticed greater use of visual aids, outlines, advance organizers, and charts. Finally, the director believes that many teachers have become more culturally aware and sensitive, and that fewer staff demonstrate the effects of ethnocentric biases, such as assuming that lack of eye contact during a conversation indicates lack of respect.

In evaluations completed after each session, participants comment on how much they have learned. The feedback suggests that teachers often begin the course with hostile attitudes toward the mandatory training, but most eventually recognize they have learned a considerable amount about ESL instruction and specific techniques to use in their classes. Several project participants have expressed interest in becoming fully certified in ESOL or bilingual education as a result of their training.

Lessons from Experience

Because the consent decree presents a top-down mandate, the program frequently finds itself combatting reluctant or unenthusiastic teachers who undergo training unwillingly. Some teachers also expressed concern that what is required today may well change tomorrow, rendering their training credits worthless. One way the program deals with these concerns is to begin each class with an introduction to the META decree and the pedagogical purposes that underlie the training. Furthermore, because the training is an extension of an existing district professional development program, staff can point to the consistencies of this program over time. All META-mandated courses apply to certification and recertification requirements, and the credit can be "banked" by teachers who have already completed continuing education requirements for the current period of employment.

Both teachers and district staff worry that the program targets too many groups of people at once. Courses are necessarily geared toward a heterogeneous group of teachers (K-12) with a variety of experiences and classroom situations. Because the program serves hundreds of teachers each year, project staff are struggling to figure out ways of tailoring the courses to match the needs of those in different assignments.
-###-


[Educational Leadership in Bilingual Education] [Table of Contents] [Fontana Career Ladder]