Preparing current administrators for new modes of leadership will require changes in content and delivery of professional development. Many formal professional development options for principals do not address the skills that leaders really need or they neglect recent research on effective teaching and schooling. Leaders in some districts have tried to compensate by forming grassroots networks for collegial learning. The challenge now is to expand these efforts, so they reach more people and last longer, without destroying the sense of ownership of one's own learning that makes these networks effective.
Schools and districts are implementing new approaches to help administrators grow intellectually and acquire new skills. In many districts, professional development is virtually indistinguishable from daily practice; roles and relationships are structured so that people learn continuously as they go about their work. Here are some examples of professional development highlighted at the Forum:
How are these districts paying for these forms of professional development, which are often more intensive and expensive than traditional workshops? Usually by reallocating existing resources. Community District #2 spends about 6 percent of its budget on professional development for teachers and principals?much higher than the average share. Much of this funding has come from cutting the numbers of district--level administrators, assistant principals, curriculum coordinators, and other midlevel administrative staff. In Boston, principals have supported their professional development by pooling a small share of resources from each school.
Key Elements of Professional Development
Forum participants identified key elements that ought to guide changes in professional development for leaders. In particular, they recommended that professional development for administrators should:
-###-
| [ How Can We Change Practice to Strengthen Leadership? ] |
[ How Can We Prepare New Leaders? ] |