Although donations of equipment and technical support can be vital in a time of tight school budgets, we have argued that technology per se does not make school reform happen. An increasing number of corporations have come to share this view and are becoming involved in longer-term partnerships, attempting to implement one or more pieces of the reform agenda. For example, the Panasonic Foundation has funded school districts for major school-restructuring experiments. These partnerships last from 5 to 10 years, during which Panasonic provides technical assistance and consultants to help the school redesign itself (Rigden 1991). In an ongoing project funded by Panasonic, the Center for Children and Technology at Bank Street College was invited to work with schools to study how laptop computers could be used to support student and teacher learning. In one eighth-grade class that is part of a restructured "school within a school," all students have laptops plus software to enable them to compose, analyze data, and prepare graphs. These tools are being used within a research-based curriculum that calls on students to both analyze data and write about a variety of science topics. An Apple Computer project, the Christopher Columbus Consortium, pairs school districts and universities to explore ways in which technology can be used to improve instruction. IBM gives grants to schools of education for the purpose of developing programs to prepare new teachers for the technology-laden classroom of the future. Another Apple program, the Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT), includes not only the infusion of large amounts of technology but also technical support in using technology in ways that support student- centered classrooms.
This page was last updated December 27, 2001 (jca)