A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Education Reforms and Students at Risk: A Review of the Current State of the Art - January 1994

REFERENCES (T-V)

Taylor, W.L. & Piche, D.M. (1990, December).
A report on shortchanging children: The impact of fiscal inequity on the education of students at risk. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Education and Labor, 101st Congress, 2nd Session, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Teddlie, C. & Stringfield, S. (1993).
Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College Press.

Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1989).
Effective vs. ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom. American Journal of Education, 97 (3), 221-236.

Tifft, S. (1990, May 21).
Fighting the failure syndrome--a radical proposal for black boys- separate classes. Time.

Tinto, V. (1975).
Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.

Toch, T. (1991).
In the name of excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Toufexis, A. (1991, May 13).
Innocent Victims. Time, 56-60.

Tuma, J.M. (1989).
Mental health services for children: The state of the art. American Psychologist, 44(2), 188-199.

Tyack, D.B. (1974).
The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Urban Institute. (1991a).
Hiring discrimination against young black men. The Urban Institute Policy and Research Report, 21(Summer), 4-5.

Urban Institute. (1991b).
Will there be a skills shortage in the year 2000? The Urban Institute Policy and Research Report, 21(Winter/Spring), 22.

Uribe, V. & Harbeck, K.M. (1992).
Addressing the needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: The origins of Project 10 and school-based intervention. In K.M. Harbeck (Ed.), Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers, and curricula. New York: Harrington Park Press.

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1976).
Fulfilling the letter and spirit of the law: Desegregation of the nation's public schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988, September).
Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989, November).
Linking for learning: A new course for education. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992).
Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. (1991).
AMERICA 2000: An education strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

U.S. Department of Education. (1993).
National study of before and after school programs. Report prepared for the Office of Policy and Planning. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (1991).
Evaluation of Upward Bound: The basic approach. Report prepared for the Office of Planning and Evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (1991).
Upward Bound program profile. (CFDA No. 84.047). Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1991).
The condition of education, vol. 1, elementary and secondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1992).
The condition of education, vol. 1, elementary and secondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1992, January).
Project Head Start statistical fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1987).
Workforce 2000: Work and workers in the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Author.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1986).
School dropouts: The extent and nature of the problem. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1990).
Promising practice: Private programs guaranteeing student aid for higher education. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991).
Transition from school to work: Linking education and worksite training. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families. (1989).
Barriers and opportunities for America's young black men. Washington, DC: Author.

Valdivieso, R. & Nicolau, S. (in press).
Look me in the eye: A Hispanic cultural perspective on school reform. In R.J. Rossi (Ed.), Educational reforms and students at risk. New York: Teacher's College Press.

Valentine, C.A. (1971).
Deficit, difference, and bicultural models of Afro-American behavior. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 137-157.

Veldman, D.J. & Sanford, J.P. (1984).
The influence of class ability level on student achievement and classroom behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 629-644.

Vgotsky, L. (1962).
Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Viadero, D. (1991, July 25).
New York regents weigh report on `multi-cultural' curriculum. Education Week, pp. 28 and 35.

Viadero, D. (1992).
New research finds little lasting harm for "crack" children. Education Week, 11(19).

Vogt, L., Jordan, C., & Tharp, R. (1987).
Explaining school failure, producing school success: Two cases. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 176-286.

Volpe, J.J. (1991).
Cognitive deficits in premature infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 325(4), 276-277.

-###-
[REFERENCES (R-S)] [Table of Contents] [REFERENCES (W-Z)]