Chapter 408
Purpose: To conduct mode1 demonstration programs in vocational education, with priority given to demonstration grants that: (1) provide for the development of telecommunications materials for use in vocational education instruction, and (2) establish demonstration centers for training dislocated workers. Other authorized demonstration programs include: grants for professional development; programs that provide basic and vocational education to criminal offenders in Federal correctional facilities; grants for dropout prevention projects; grants for developing business and education standards for competencies in industries and trades; regional centers that provide training for skilled trades; and projects that integrate vocational and academic instruction.
Funding History
| Fiscal Year | Appropriation |
|---|---|
| 1984 | $570,000 |
| 1985 | 143,000 |
| 1986 | -0- |
| 1987 | 450,000 |
| 1988 | 14,792,000 |
| 1989 | 14,594,000 |
| 1990 | 11,096,000 |
| 1991 | 12,970,000 |
| 1992 | 20,000,000 |
| 1993 | 16,705,000 |
| 1994 | 23,455,000 |
Education Programs for Correctional Institutions. Eleven grants were awarded in FY 1992 to demonstrate model vocational education programs for incarcerated individuals. These programs were authorized to expand or improve existing vocational education programs in correctional institutions, use curricula that include literacy and basic skills training, integrate academic content with vocational content, and provide for "live work." Programs also included transitional services, including the coordination of those services provided by community agencies.
The Business and Education Standards Program provides financial assistance for organizing and operating business-education-labor technical committees to develop national skill standards for competencies in industries and trade. In FY 1993, 16 grants were awarded to develop standards for (1) major divisions or specialty areas identified within occupations, (2) minimum hours of study to be competent in such division or specialty areas, (3) minimum tools and equipment required in such divisions or specialty areas, (4) minimum qualifications for instruction staff, and (5) minimum tasks to be included in any course of study to prepare individuals for work in such division or specialty areas.
School-to-Work Transition. Eight states (Wisconsin, Oregon, Maine, New York, Michigan, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Kentucky) were awarded grants to implement school-to-work transition systems under the Cooperative Demonstration Program. The eight states received a total of $43 million in FY 1994 funds, with funding renewals expected for an additional four years under the recently enacted School to Work Opportunities Act. All other states were awarded grants under Department of Labor programs to develop plans for implementing school-to-work systems. The objective of the program is to help states develop coherent systems that facilitate the transition of young people from high school to advanced training and/or the workplace. State school-to-work systems will include a school-based learning component, a work-based learning component, and connecting activities between the two components.
As shown in the following table, one-third of the projects achieved a significant reduction in the number of participants who dropped out of school. Projects were generally more successful in improving participants' school performance and affiliation.
| Outcome | Number of Projects |
|---|---|
| Reduction in dropping out | 4 |
| Increase in grade point average | 10 |
| Reduction in number of courses failed | 7 |
| Increase in number of credits earned | 5 |
| Reduction in number of absences | 5 |
| Improvement in students' perception of teachers and instruction | 4 |
| Improvement in students' perception of counselors and counseling | 2 |
| Increase in students' perception that school is safe | 7 |
| Students' perception of receiving more academic encouragement | 4 |
| Students' perception of receiving better job preparation | 3 |
Across the projects participating in the evaluation, the following components were more likely to be associated with improved persistence in high school and educational success of at-risk youth participating in the program relative to a control/comparison group:
Gail Schwartz, (202) 205-5621
:Business and Education Standards Program:
Carolyn Lee, (202) 260-9576
:Integration of Vocational Education and Academic Learning (Tech Prep):
Carolyn Lee, (202) 260-9576