For each new teacher, a school receives funding that is 1.2 times the base salary of a new teacher. The 20 percent funding (known as the ".2") is to provide AGP support activities that will help a new teacher meet registration requirements. Most schools use these funds to pay for a substitute to cover the new teachers' or tutor teachers' classrooms while they are involved in AGP activities. No accounting is required on the use of .2 funds by the schools, nor is the school legally obligated to use the .2 funds for advice and guidance.
The AGP program is two years long, although it is most intense in the first year and the additional .2 funding is only for one year.
Each school is charged with adapting TRB-promulgated principles (Exhibit 1) to the needs of the school and individual teacher. In most schools visited, responsibility for the AGP was delegated to the deputy principal. In primary schools, the deputy principal often serves as the tutor (supervisory) teacher; in secondary schools, the deputy principal plays a supervisory role.
The TRB provides many examples of the purposes for which the .2 should be used. For example, the .2 should provide release time for new teachers to consult with their tutors, to observe other classes and schools, and to attend courses at regional teacher-support centers. In practice, however, the .2 also is often used by new teachers for additional time to plan for classes, perform marking, and, as one new teacher remarked: "to put my feet up on my desk and relax for a half hour." School-level personnel generally believe that these activities also are important.
Principals are very concerned that new teachers find a balance between their school and personal lives, and that the new teacher be sufficiently rested to "perform well in the classroom."
Role of the Tutor Teacher. Tutor teachers are the key staff members responsible for implementing the AGP. They set the tone and organize the program. Tutors or supervisory teachers (who may have part- or full-time administrative responsibilities) are chosen by the principal or deputy principal. In many cases, the principal discusses the assignment with other senior school staff. The assignment often is made before the new school year, and tutors "host" the new teacher during the new teacher's initial visits (which occur before they take up their appointment) to the school. Tutors plan the AGP and, with input from new teachers, plan the use of the.2 for first-year teachers. They schedule meetings, make formal and informal visits to the new teacher's classroom, record the advice and guidance given, and provide monthly reports to the principal or deputy principal that identify the strengths and needs of the new teacher.
At the start of the school year, tutors typically have scheduled meetings with the new teacher at least once a week. These meetings usually take place after school. In addition, tutors and new teachers often teach in the same syndicate (a group of students and teachers clustered together as a school within a school), team-teach, or work in adjacent classrooms. A great deal of time is spent providing informal observations, support, and advice.
During the first term, most tutors prepare written monthly reports. In some cases, new teachers draft the monthly report as an exercise in reflection and self-appraisal. As the year progresses, tutors and new teachers tend to increase the level of informal interactions and reduce the formal meetings, although great variation exists both between and within schools. Tutors have, with input from new teachers, developed their own modus operandi. These informal meetings take place during tea breaks, lunch, classes, after school, in the evening, and occasionally on weekends.
Tutors spend about five hours a week on induction-related activities. Typically, tutors provide hints and suggestions about approaches and resources that have or have not worked for them, explain how to plan more efficiently, listen to and comment on ideas that the new teacher is thinking about trying, provide support with classroom and individual student-management issues, and generally are there with "a shoulder to cry on." Although the new teachers do not have a choice of tutors, most new teachers we spoke to were very happy about their relationship with their tutors. In cases where personal rapport was not particularly good, new teachers still found that tutors provided sound professional advice.
About half of the tutors interviewed had participated in tutor-training sessions offered by colleges of education and teacher support services. Participation in these courses is voluntary.
Role of the New Teacher in the Teacher Induction Program. All provisionally registered teachers seeking to become fully registered participate in an AGP. New teachers are responsible for organizing, with their tutors, the operation of the AGP and the effective use of the .2 release time. New teachers are expected to be open, to be willing to seek feedback and act on sound advice, to initiate requests for support, and to work with their tutor to become a quality teacher. New teachers participate in preparing monthly reports describing their accomplishments, progress, and professional development needs. This monthly report forms the basis for documentation supplied to the TRB by the school recommending the new teacher for full registration.
EXHIBIT 1
|
New teachers in New Zealand usually have a reduced teaching load the first year. In most primary schools, this provides new teachers an average of half a day per week out of their classroom. In some weeks, they will attend full-day courses (discussed below); in other weeks, they may spend a few hours visiting other classrooms or schools or use their release time to meet with their tutors or other school staff. In a few cases, the primary teacher is in his or her classroom only four days a week.
NINE MAIN TYPES OF TEACHER INDUCTION ACTIVITIES
|
Most principals interviewed want to assign new teachers to classes that they do not expect to be problematic. Whenever possible, in their first year, new teachers will not be assigned to classes with students with a history of disruptive behavior or whose parents are particularly demanding or "difficult." In the second year, although allowances may still be made if possible, it is also likely that they will be assigned to any class. However, this is not always the case in practice: principals' intentions often break down over the school year, and scheduling conflicts at the secondary level sometimes preclude the deliberate matching of teachers to classes.
Blackstone College. Blackstone College is a secondary school with 1,150 students; 30 percent are either Maori or Pacific Islands, and an increasing number of students are recent immigrants from central Europe and Southeast Asia. The school ranks (according to a New Zealand school classification system) in the second lowest socioeconomic (SES) decile, and, for its decile ranking, its students achieve high scores on national tests. The deputy principal runs a formal one-year course with all new teachers. This program, the syllabus for which is shown in Exhibit 2, exemplifies a very structured AGP. Each week all new teachers in the school meet with the deputy principal (and other teachers and specialists, as appropriate) to discuss a specific topic. The syllabus starts with general issues of classroom, student, and school management. Over the school year, as new teachers have more experiences to bring to the course, more detailed information about these topics, as well as special-interest topics, are provided. The school hires "relievers" to cover classes when other teachers and specialists are involved. New teachers' schedules provide release time for the time required to participate in the induction course. The deputy principal also has regular meetings with each new teacher to discuss personal problems and individual needs.
New teachers also have one or more tutor teachers (one for each subject area taught). The tutors conduct classroom observations and provide curriculum-based support.
A common practice followed at Blackstone College is to provide newly hired teachers with reading material, before the school year begins, describing the school's goals, policies, and procedures. Teachers also are invited to spend time at the school at the end of the term prior to their arrival.
Blackstone College provides more release time for its new teachers than the funded .2 time. The principal and senior management, supported by the board of trustees, believe that the school should use additional resources to provide a better AGP. The school's philosophy is to invest in preventive training, rather than face the potential costly consequences of inadequately prepared teachers.
EXHIBIT 2Aims
Week
|
Recommendation for registration is based on input from the tutor (who is usually the head of a department), the deputy principal, the principal, and, in contrast to most schools, a principal from another school. The input from the other principal provides an outsider's perspective--one not biased by personal interactions. The board of trustees is advised regarding the administration's actions but plays no active role.
PROFILES OF NEW TEACHERSJack's main reaction to his first year was that it was very busy but also very successful.... One of the reasons Jack is pleased with his class progress is that the has what he calls "a pretty flash class," handpicked for a beginning teacher, which means he has been able to use peer tutoring for any children needing help.... He thinks he has developed "heaps" as a teacher and sometimes has to "pinch" himself when he thinks of what a huge hurdle his final sole charge section was at college, and now he has had nearly a year in charge of a class and he has learnt so much, particularly control strategies, management and refining plans, and evaluation techniques. "It's been a growing year, and so will the next two." |
Milltown. In contrast, Milltown School and Downey School provide two less formal examples of an AGP. At Milltown, an intermediate school with 500 students--of whom 18 percent are Maori--the AGP program is built around a school-wide program of continual assessment and evaluation. New teachers are quickly integrated into all school activities through the use of staff diaries; open communications; and student, parent, and teacher surveys that measure teaching quality, academic rigor, student reporting, general environment, customer responsiveness, and general satisfaction at the school. Last year Milltown had four new teachers. Each new teacher was assigned to a different syndicate (a staff grouping) so as not to compete for staff support time. In addition, the new teachers regularly met together, and individually, with the principal to discuss building relationships with the students--which the principal believes are key to creating a classroom where learning takes place. Each new teacher has a tutor, who determines the kind and level of support to be provided to the new teacher. For one teacher, formal observations every two weeks were the focus of her AGP. The other three new teachers rarely had formal observations; instead, they met informally with tutors as needed.
Monthly reports are prepared on all new teachers. Interpreting the recommendations of the TRB, the monthly reports describe a teachers development of strengths according to seven criteria: personal-professional qualities; relationships with pupils; planning preparation and records; curriculum provision; teaching technique and classroom management; contribution towards work of the school; and other factors.
Milltown School provides each new teacher a handbook that describes its AGP. The handbook describes the roles and responsibilities of the principal, deputy principal, tutor teacher, and new teacher; the use of the additional .2 staffing component; observation as a part of the AGP; a calendar of AGP activities (beginning orientation, first term, remainder of first year, and second year); record keeping; and strategies for dealing with "at risk" new teachers. The handbook does not describe or provide examples of new teacher coping strategies. In contrast to Blackstone College, Milltown School's teacher induction is driven by process and outcome indicators; few specifics (except in the case of at-risk new teachers) are provided as to how the tutor and new teacher interact and what activities they undertake.
Downey School. Downey is a primary school with 256 children--55 percent Maori, 30 percent Pacific Islanders, and 15 percent "from the rest of the world." Student mobility is 40 percent from year to year, and many children live in "at-risk" homes. The entire staff, all but one of which is female, strives to provide a nurturing environment for students and staff alike. The school's philosophy is to focus on producing healthy, happy children who enjoy learning. Its instructional philosophy involves the extensive use of computers by teachers and students, an approach that challenges new teachers because they have had limited exposure to computer applications.
New teachers are supported by all other staff members at Downey School. New teachers are expected to lead a committee (like any other teacher), to provide expertise in some part of new curricula, and to participate in school and individual professional development. Few formal observations and written reports are prepared regarding the new teacher's performance. Similar to Blackstone College, Downey School is fully responsible for its own advice and guidance program. However, in contrast to Blackstone College, the AGP is much more informal. Tutor teachers spend about five hours a week working with new teachers. A strong mentoring relationship is forged, built around ad hoc support and availability. This time declines in the second year. The AGP is run by the deputy principal. The principal meets formally with each teacher, new and experienced, once a year, to discuss the teacher's performance and prepare a development plan for the next year. In contrast to the principals at most schools visited, the principal at Downey has been there 8 years and the deputy principal 10 years (having advanced from a beginning teacher).
In her first year, one new teacher opted to take each Wednesday off to use for AGP, and personal and professional development activities. Although the new teacher, now in her second year, is performing well and was just recommended for full registration, the principal would prefer that the .2 allocation be used differently. The principal would prefer that the .2 allocation (which she is strongly in favor of and would "fight to keep") be used differently or more flexibly than is currently the case in most schools, including her own--she suggested, or example, that a new teacher could take a week at a time out of the classroom to undertake a course, etc., rather than taking one day every week out of the classroom which she feels is "very disruptive for new teachers when they are trying to develop classroom management and organisation skills." The new (second year) teacher also agreed, saying that although she found her day out of the classroom very valuable (for observing in other schools, attending short courses, carrying out student assessments, planning, marking student assignments, and generally having a break from working directly with students), her students were always harder to settle and manage the day after her absence. Both principal and new teacher agreed that it would be good for schools to have the option of spreading the .2 allocation over two years--allowing second year teachers the opportunity to benefit from having some time out of the classroom for other things, now that they were more skilled and confident about their class handling skills (which is clearly the biggest hurdle for most first-year teachers).
At Blackstone, Milltown, and Downey, none of the new teachers interviewed viewed the AGP as an `assessment program per se. Although aware of the importance of becoming fully registered, these new teachers were not concerned about the process required to become registered. They viewed observations and formal written reports as supporting their transition and helping get their careers off on a sound footing. As one new teacher noted: "This process is continuous for two years, with immediate feedback. I never have felt that I was being tested or evaluated. I felt I could ask my tutor anything, and I did."
The AGP reflects the culture of each school, just as the self-management of schools in New Zealand is meant to be responsive to the culture of each schools particular community. The tone for the AGP is typically established by the principal or deputy principal. However, the success or failure of the AGP depends on the relationship developed between the tutor and new teacher.
Changes Over Time. The national advice and guidance framework and its implementation by primary and secondary schools began in 1989. However, the .2 time and many elements of the AGP predate these reforms. In 1972 secondary schools began providing AGP programs, when primary schools were already involved in AGP. Secondary schools also had a school board prior to the 1989 reforms. From the beginning, the AGP was intended as a dialogue--a consensus process in which "assessment was an organic process, without the pitfalls of one-off observations (a scheduled observation that occurs once a term or year by the principal in which the new teacher typically delivers a highly structured and tested lesson plan) and tick-the-boxes evaluations." Formerly, an inspectorate provided the formal evaluation process for certification as a trained teacher. This shifted to the schools, as part of the administrative reforms, and altered the responsibilities of school personnel.
USES OF NEW TEACHERS' RELEASE TIME"I wasn't allowed to use my .2 the first six weeks. The school wants new teachers to develop a strong relationship with the kids and believes that absences work against developing this relationship. After six weeks, I used the time to visit a few classrooms and another school. Over time, I just used it to do planning so I got to sleep earlier.""I went to the courses run by teacher support services and visited other classes. I don't think it works out to .2, but I feel Ive received all the support I need." |
Many administrators who were interviewed reported that in the early years, many teachers did not receive release time, although .2 funding was provided by the Department of Education. Today, most respondents believed that most teachers appear to receive most of, if not more than, the .2 release time to participate in induction support activities. The high level at which new teachers receive release time nowadays represents the cumulative efforts of the TRB, teachers unions, and teacher training colleges to inform new teachers of the existence of these resources and their intended purposes.
Since 1989, the TRB has introduced several changes in the registration policy. The criteria requiring teachers to "promote health and personal safety of children" was added in 1993, in response to an early childhood initiative. The TRB also has clarified what is meant by "fitness to be a teacher." In the initial registration materials, the TRB specifications were extremely vague. Although still general, the new guidelines provide a much better sense of what schools should consider in recommending new teachers for registration and maintaining registration for experienced teachers. The TRB also modified its procedures for teachers returning to teaching after a long hiatus. The TRB is now adopting procedures for non-registered relief teachers, so they can achieve full registration.
A second component of New Zealand's teacher induction program is the support offered by the teacher support services. The Ministry has entered into contracts with each college of education to assist schools in improving their self-management. One contractual activity in this area (see Exhibit 3) is that the teacher support services associated with each college will provide activities for new teachers to a specified number of schools in their regions. In most cases, these services consist of bringing new teachers together to network with other new teachers and to develop professional friendships with peers. Many schools (until this year) had only one or two new teachers.
Staff of the teacher support services also visit schools and, informally, seek to ensure that the new teacher is provided the .2 time and a strong AGP. Most of the resources provided by the Ministry are used to provide a series of monthly or bimonthly workshops. In some regions, schools pay a nominal fee to send their new teachers to these courses.
Teacher support services in each of the two centers visited aim the majority of their courses and networking activities toward primary schools, with special attention to rural schools. The centers direct their activities to schools with new teachers who have more limited access to successful role models within their schools. Secondary schools are de-emphasized because their large size provides the potential of more role models. Also, teacher support services assume that department heads at secondary schools will provide extensive support. Exhibit 4 provides an example outline of the types of courses offered to new teachers by teacher support services.
| EXHIBIT 3
Professional and School Development Services
|
||
|
Objective
Support schools in their program of advice and guidance for the induction of provisionally registered teachers |
Performance Measure
Quality a) teachers and/or boards satisfied with appropriateness, effectiveness, and efficiency of support provided Quantity b) number of primary schools |
Performance Target
Ninety percent of teachers and/or boards responding to surveys indicate satisfaction Primary schools |
Some centers also provide brief courses (e.g., four three-hour sessions) for tutor teachers. Topics at the tutor-training courses include communicating with new teachers, providing feedback, and handling problems.
-###-