ED Seal
Table of contents
Title page
Introduction
Acknowledgments
National Summary
State Profiles
-Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Sources
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Full report in PDF format (956K)

State Education Indicators With a Focus on Title I

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

South Carolina
sde.state.sc.us


School and Teacher Demographics

Number of districts
(CCD, 1998-99)
90

Number of public schools in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
588 245 204 19 2

Student/teacher ratio
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High
15:1 16:1 16:1

Number of FTE teachers in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
20,437 9,882 11,435 551 117

Public school enrollment
  1989-90 1998-99
K-8
(CCD)
443,712 468,852
9-12
(CCD)
172,465 186,745
Pre-K
(by state definition)
n/a n/a

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1996-97)

State 51.5%, Local 40.0%, Federal 8.5%

Top


Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1989-90 1998-99
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 0.1% 0.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 0.6 0.9
Black 41.1 42.0
Hispanic 0.3 1.2
White 57.9 55.7

Students with disabilities
(OSEP, K-12)
1990-91 1998-99
n/a 13.6%

Limited English proficient
(USED/NCBE, K-12)
1989-90 1996-97
n/a 3,202

Migrant
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1998-99
2,227 1,803

High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)
1993-94 1997-98
n/a n/a

Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)
1994-95 1997-98
58% 59%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program*
(CCD, 1998-99)

For 0 to 34%, 394 schools; 35 to 49%, 210 schools; 50 to 74%, 285 schools; and 75 to 100%, 141 schools.

*28 schools did not report.

Top


Statewide Accountability Information

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Beginning 2001: Rating based on percent students meeting standard (5 levels)

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Rewards for high improvement of students using matched longitudinal data

Indicators for School Accountability
CRT scores

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Annual improvement toward 75 percent Basic in E/LA and 70% Basic in Math

Schools Meeting Title I AYP Goal
424 (85.0%)

Top


Title I Schools

Title I enrollment
(USED)
  1998-99
K-8 197,844
9-12 6,882
Pre-K n/a

Race/ethnicity
(USED, K-12)
  Schoolwide Targeted
Assistance
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 481 30
Asian/Pacific Islander 946 41
Black 124,604 3,950
Hispanic 3,408 88
White 75,841 3,197

Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, USED, 1998-99)
$96,977,396

Number of schools with Title I programs
Schoolwide vs. targeted assistance (USED)

In 1996, 151 schools with schoolwide programs and 329 schools with targeted assistance; in 1998, 399 schoolwide, 96 targeted assistance; in 1999, 419 schoolwide, 80 targeted assistance

Top


Assessment Information

Assessment Reported
Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test

Progress Toward Assessment Aligned with Standards
Performance standards did not meet review criteria of the U.S. Department of Education.

State Definition of "Proficient" used since 1995-1996
Students who perform at the "Proficient" level on the PACT have met expectations for student performance based on the curriculum standards approved by the State board of Education.

Exclusion from Assessment
During the 1999-2000 school year, students who qualify for the PACT Alternate Assessment are exempt. Some LEP students may be exempt based on the curriculum standards approved by the State Board of Education

Other Assessments
BSAP

Top


Student Achievement 1998-1999

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Grade 4

Reading/ Language Arts
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students 35% 37% 26% 3%
Title I Schoolwide 43 37 19 1
Title I Targeted 30 38 29 3
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students 63 30 7 0
Migrant students        

 

Mathematics
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students 45% 37% 13% 5%
Title I Schoolwide 55 34 8 2
Title I Targeted 39 40 16 5
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students 57 36 5 2
Migrant students        

Grade 8

Reading/Language Arts
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students 38% 41% 19% 3%
Title I Schoolwide 51 39 10 1
Title I Targeted 29 43 24 4
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students 85 15 0 0
Migrant students        

 

Mathematics
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students 49% 36% 10% 5%
Title I Schoolwide 63 30 5 2
Title I Targeted 38 39 14 9
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students 71 29 0 0
Migrant students        

Grade

Reading
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students        
Title I Schoolwide        
Title I Targeted        

 

Mathematics
  Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced
All Students        
Title I Schoolwide        
Title I Targeted        

 

Top

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 22% 22%
Basic level and above 55% 65%
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above 18% 17%
Basic level and above 60% 54%

Top


Sources


[Rhode Island] | [South Dakota]

This page last modified—December 27, 2002 (jer).

Technical questions about the Web site: webmaster@ed.gov