ED Seal
Table of contents
•Title page
•Introduction
•Acknowledgments
•National Summary
State Profiles
-Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
•Sources
•Appendix A
•Appendix B
•Appendix C
•Full report in PDF format (956K)

State Education Indicators With a Focus on Title I

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Michigan
http://www.mde.state.mi.us/

School and Teacher Demographics

Number of districts
(CCD, 1998-99)		 733
Number of public schools in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
2,150 627 684 92 103
Student/teacher ratio
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High
19:1 18:1 19:1
Number of FTE teachers in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
42,906 19,350 24,720 1,973 1,185
Public school enrollment
  1989-90 1998-99
K-8
(CCD)		 1,127,921 1,181,032
9-12
(CCD)		 448,864 474,080
Pre-K
(by state definition)		 n/a 15,199

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1996-97)

State 66.0%, Local 27.3%, Federal 6.6%, Intermediate 0.1%

Top

Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1989-90 1998-99
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 0.9% 1.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander 1.2 1.7
Black 17.8 19.4
Hispanic 2.3 3.0
White 77.8 74.9
Students with disabilities
(OSEP, K-12)
1990-91 1998-99
9.5% 10.4%
Limited English proficient
(USED/NCBE, K-12)
1989-90 1996-97
33,449 25,988
Migrant
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1998-99
20,018 17,058
High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)
1993-94 1997-98
n/a n/a
Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)
1994-95 1997-98
60% 63%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program*
(CCD, 1998-99)

For 0 to 34%, 2,625 schools; 35 to 49%, 380 schools; 50 to 74%, 385 schools; and 75 to 100%, 265 schools.

*One school did not report.

Top

Statewide Accountability Information

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
66% at highest level in each of 4 subjects for 2 of last 3 years

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Statistically significant gain every 2 years

Indicators for School Accountability
CRT (MEAP) test scores, percent of students assessed

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Close gap for school 10 percent between high and low gain per year in level annually

Schools Meeting Title I AYP Goal
1,290 (64.1%)

Top

Title I Schools

Title I enrollment
(USED)
  1998-99
K-8 436,186
9-12 43,511
Pre-K n/a
Race/ethnicity
(USED, K-12)
  Schoolwide Targeted
Assistance
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 2,204 3,575
Asian/Pacific Islander 2,535 3,132
Black 191,988 36,766
Hispanic 12,853 8,585
White 59,683 156,737
Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, USED, 1998-99)		 $342,425,049

Number of schools with Title I programs
Schoolwide vs. targeted assistance (USED)

In 1996, 102 schools with schoolwide programs and 2,232 schools with targeted assistance; in 1998, 553 schoolwide, 1,296 targeted assistance; in 1999, 594 schoolwide, 1,417 targeted assistance

Top

Assessment Information

Assessment Reported
MEAP Essential Skills-Reading, used since 1999; MEAP High School Test, used since 1998; some categories do not add up to 100% due to omission of scores by student request.

Progress Toward Assessment Aligned with Standards
Performance standards did not meet review criteria of the U.S. Department of Education.

State Definition of "Proficient"
Satisfactory: the student scored 300 scale score or above on each reading selection from the MEAP Essential Skills Reading Test. The student scored 520 or more on overall performance in the MEAP Essential Skills Mathematics Test.

Exclusion from Assessment
LEP and special education students

Other Assessments
Science and Writing, Grades 5, 8 and 11.

Top

Student Achievement 1998-1999

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Grade 4

Reading/Language Arts
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students 15.1% 25.5% 59.4%
Title I Schoolwide 24.8 29.4 45.8
Title I Targeted 13.2 25.3 61.5
Percent of School in Poverty      
  00-34 9.6 22.7 67.7
  75-100 30.3 31.6 38.1
LEP Students 35.9 32.5 31.6
Migrant students 34.7 23.6 41.7

Student achievement trend
Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Satisfactory

For 1995-96, 49.9% of all students, 57.0% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 37.0% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1996-97, 49.0% of all students, 55.7% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 35.4% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1997-98, 58.6% of all students, 69.5% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 44.3% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1998-99, 59.4% of all students, 67.7% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 38.1% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory.

Mathematics
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students 10.6% 17.7% 71.7%
Title I Schoolwide 19.1 22.0 58.9
Title I Targeted 8.6 17.7 73.7
Percent of School in Poverty      
  00-34 5.8 14.5 79.7
  75-100 23.0 23.3 53.7
LEP Students 19.4 26.8 53.8
Migrant students 19.4 25.0 55.6

Grade 7

Reading/Language Arts
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students 20.4% 26.6% 53.0%
Title I Schoolwide 33.7 30.2 36.1
Title I Targeted 20.6 26.7 52.7
Percent of School in Poverty      
  00-34 16.0 25.4 58.5
  75-100 35.8 31.7 32.5
LEP Students 55.6 25.3 19.0
Migrant students 58.3 22.5 19.2

 

Mathematics
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students 13.8% 23.0% 63.2%
Title I Schoolwide 30.5 30.2 39.3
Title I Targeted 13.4 23.6 63.0
Percent of School in Poverty      
  00-34 9.0 20.5 70.5
  75-100 38.7 30.7 30.6
LEP Students 35.5 30.8 33.7
Migrant students 39.0 31.4 29.7

Student achievement trend
Math 7th grade meets or exceeds Satisfactory

For 1995-96, 55.0% of all students, 60.0% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 29.8% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1996-97, 51.4% of all students, 57.1% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 28.7% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1997-98, 61.4% of all students, 71.5% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 36.7% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory. For 1998-99, 63.2% of all students, 70.5% of students at schools with less than 35% of students in poverty, and 30.6% of students at schools with 75% or more in poverty meet or exceed Satisfactory.

Grade

Reading/Language Arts
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students      
Title I Schoolwide      
Title I Targeted      

 

Mathematics
  Low Moderate Satisfactory
All Students      
Title I Schoolwide      
Title I Targeted      

Top

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 28% n/a
Basic level and above 63% n/a
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above 29% 29%
Basic level and above 72% 70%

Top

Sources

[Massachusetts] | [Minnesota]

This page last modified—December 27, 2002 (jer).
Technical questions about the Web site: webmaster@ed.gov