ED Seal
Table of contents
Title page
Introduction
Acknowledgments
National Summary
State Profiles
-Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Sources
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Full report in PDF format (956K)

State Education Indicators With a Focus on Title I

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Maine
http://www.state.me.us/education/homepage.htm


School and Teacher Demographics

Number of districts
(CCD, 1998-99)
282

Number of public schools in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
440 125 108 16 1

Student/teacher ratio
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High
15:1 15:1 15:1

Number of FTE teachers in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
6,770 3,095 4,070 322 5

Public school enrollment
  1989-90 1998-99
K-8
(CCD)
152,267 147,597
9-12
(CCD)
61,508 59,061
Pre-K
(by state definition)
n/a 1,031

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1996-97)

State 45.5%, Local 47.5%, Federal 7.0%

Top


Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1989-90 1998-99
American Indian/Alaskan Natives n/a 0.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander n/a 0.9
Black n/a 1.0
Hispanic n/a 0.5
White n/a 97.1

Students with disabilities
(OSEP, K-12)
1990-91 1998-99
11.6% 14.1%

Limited English proficient
(USED/NCBE, K-12)
1989-90 1996-97
1,822 2,386

Migrant
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1998-99
7,582 4,887

High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)
1993-94 1997-98
3.3% 3.2%

Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)
1994-95 1997-98
50% 60%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program*
(CCD, 1998-99)

For 0 to 34%, 459 schools; 35 to 49%, 152 schools; 50 to 74%, 48 schools; and 75 to 100%, 6 schools.

*25 schools did not report.

Top


Statewide Accountability Information

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Only performance reporting

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
None.

Indicators for School Accountability
None

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Improve % of students moving up at 4 levels, improve sub groups performance, scores on local reading test

Schools Meeting Title I AYP Goal
Not available

Top


Title I Schools

Title I enrollment
(USED)
  1998-99
K-8 25,168
9-12 404
Pre-K n/a

Race/ethnicity
(USED, K-12)
  Schoolwide Targeted
Assistance
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 79 86
Asian/Pacific Islander 155 95
Black 210 191
Hispanic 69 125
White 6,933 17,970

Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, USED, 1998-99)
$33,708,021

Number of schools with Title I programs
Schoolwide vs. targeted assistance (USED)

In 1996, no schools with schoolwide programs and 533 schools with targeted assistance; in 1998, 46 schoolwide, 379 targeted assistance; in 1999, 51 schoolwide, 411 targeted assistance

Top


Assessment Information

Assessment Reported
Maine Educational Assessment, used since 1985; Test revisions to reflect new state standards expected during 1997-98.
Revisions will be in place for the 1998-99 school year.

Progress Toward Assessment Aligned with Standards
Performance standards met review criteria of the U.S. Department of Education.

State Definition of "Proficient"
Meets the Standards (Score of 541 and above)

Definition of Title I Targeted Assistance
All students in Title I schools at tested grade are included in the assessment results.

Exclusion from Assessment
Primary reasons Disability, LRP Status, and Other.

Other Assessments
No information provided

Top


Student Achievement 1998-1999

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Grade 4

Reading/Language Arts
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 10.2% 42.5% 46.0% 1.3%
Title I Schoolwide 10.9 43.0 45.3 0.8
Title I Targeted 10.4 43.2 45.2 1.2
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-20 7.5 39.0 52.0 1.5
  50-100 10.6 46.2 42.6 0.6
LEP Students 10.0 55.0 35.0 0.0
Migrant students 15.0 56.0 29.0 0.0

Student achievement trend
Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Standard

For 1998-99, 47.3% of all students, 53.5% of students at schools with less than 21% of students in poverty, and 43.2% of students at schools with 50% or more in poverty meet or exceed Standard.

Mathematics
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 28.0% 48.4% 22.6% 1.0%
Title I Schoolwide 23.8 54.2 21.8 0.2
Title I Targeted 28.5 48.2 22.1 1.2
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-20 24.0 46.0 28.7 1.3
  50-100 25.9 55.9 18.2 0.0
LEP Students 25.0 60.0 14.0 1.0
Migrant students 43.0 45.0 12.0 0.0

Grade 8

Reading/LanguageArts
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 9.7% 51.2% 36.9% 2.2%
Title I Schoolwide 8.0 53.7 37.5 0.8
Title I Targeted 9.3 51.6 36.6 2.5
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-20 8.2 47.4 42.2 2.2
  50-100 22.0 70.0 8.0 0.0
LEP Students 23.0 59.0 17.0 1.0
Migrant students 22.0 54.0 24.0 0.0

 

Mathematics
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 40.6% 40.4% 18.3% 0.7%
Title I Schoolwide 47.8 39.2 12.4 0.6
Title I Targeted 40.5 40.9 18.1 0.5
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-20 34.7 42.1 22.1 1.1
  50-100 67.0 33.0 0.0 0.0
LEP Students 51.0 40.0 7.0 2.0
Migrant students 60.0 30.0 8.0 2.0

Student achievement trend
Math 8th grade meets or exceeds Standard

For 1998-99, 19.0% of all students, 23.2% of students at schools with less than 21% of students in poverty, and 0.0% of students at schools with 50% or more in poverty meet or exceed Standard.

Grade 11

Reading
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 7.4% 44.5% 45.5% 2.6%
Title I Schoolwide 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0
Title I Targeted 5.5 55.5 38.0 1.0

 

Mathematics
  Does not Meet the Standards Partially Meets the Standard Meets the Standard Exceeds the Standard
All Students 37.0% 43.4% 18.1% 1.5%
Title I Schoolwide 38.0 62.0 0.0 0.0
Title I Targeted 39.1 41.8 16.7 2.4

Top

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 36% 42%
Basic level and above 73% 84%
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above 24% 32%
Basic level and above 74% 76%

Top


Sources


[Louisiana] | [Maryland]

This page last modified—December 27, 2002 (jer).

Technical questions about the Web site: webmaster@ed.gov