ED Seal
Table of contents
Title page
Introduction
Acknowledgments
National Summary
State Profiles
-Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Sources
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Full report in PDF format (956K)

State Education Indicators With a Focus on Title I

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Delaware
http://www.doe.state.de.us/


School and Teacher Demographics

Number of districts
(CCD, 1998-99)
19

Number of public schools in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
93 45 33 14 0

Student/teacher ratio
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High
17:1 17:1 16:1

Number of FTE teachers in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
2,767 1,895 2,062 268 0

Public school enrollment
  1989-90 1998-99
K-8
(CCD)
70,699 79,353
9-12
(CCD)
27,109 33,355
Pre-K
(by state definition)
n/a 602

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1996-97)

State 64.4%, Local 28.0%, Federal 7.6%

Top


Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1989-90 1998-99
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 0.1% 0.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 1.5 2.0
Black 26.9 30.4
Hispanic 2.6 4.9
White 68.7 62.4

Students with disabilities
(OSEP, K-12)
1990-91 1998-99
12.4% 11.5%

Limited English proficient
(USED/NCBE, K-12)
1989-90 1996-97
1,470 1,928

Migrant
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1998-99
740 586

High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)
1993-94 1997-98
4.6% 4.7%

Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)
1994-95 1997-98
65% 84%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program
(CCD, 1998-99)

For 0 to 34%, 118 schools; 35 to 49%, 51 schools; 50 to 74%, 15 schools; and 75 to 100%, 1 school.

Top


Statewide Accountability Information

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Meet state standards on DSTP (4 subjects)--Performance Ratings

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Absolute score, average improved performance, and improved lower levels over 2 years of scores.

Indicators for School Accountability
CRT (DSTP)

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Same system (by 2001)

Schools Meeting Title I AYP Goal
13 (12.9%)

Top


Title I Schools

Title I enrollment
(USED)
  1998-99
K-8 16,199
9-12 189
Pre-K n/a

Race/ethnicity
(USED, K-12)
  Schoolwide Targeted
Assistance
American Indian/Alaskan Natives n/a 20
Asian/Pacific Islander 2,228 3,678
Black 70 94
Hispanic 457 691
White 4,385 4,977

Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, USED, 1998-99)
$19,525,179

Number of schools with Title I programs
Schoolwide vs. targeted assistance (USED)

In 1996, no schools with schoolwide programs and 110 schools with targeted assistance; in 1998, 12 schoolwide, 96 targeted assistance; in 1999, 12 schoolwide, 89 targeted assistance

Top


Assessment Information

Assessment Reported
Delaware Student Testing Program

Progress Toward Assessment Aligned with Standards
Performance standards met review criteria of the U.S. Department of Education.

State Definition of "Proficient"
Meets the standard-very good performance.

Exclusion from Assessment
Small percentage of students with disabilities and LEP students as per decision of IEP or child study team

Other Assessments
None

Top


Student Achievement 1998-1999

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Grade 3

Reading/LanguageArts
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 16.0% 15.4% 47.7% 11.7% 9.2%
Title I Schoolwide 32.0 26.3 35.6 4.0 2.1
Title I Targeted          
Percent of School in Poverty          
  00-34          
  75-100          
LEP Students 61.6 21.2 14.1 2.0 1.0
Migrant students          

 

Mathematics
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 17.5% 19.0% 49.0% 10.9% 3.7%
Title I Schoolwide 29.9 27.7 36.7 4.2 1.6
Title I Targeted          
Percent of School in Poverty          
  00-34          
  75-100          
LEP Students 49.5 27.3 22.2 0.0 1.0
Migrant students          

Grade 8

Reading/LanguageArts
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 20.1% 17.8% 54.1% 5.3% 2.8%
Title I Schoolwide 20.1 17.8 54.1 5.3 2.8
Title I Targeted          
Percent of School in Poverty          
  00-34          
  75-100          
LEP Students 53.6 16.1 28.6 1.8 0
Migrant students          

 

Mathematics
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 40.0% 24.2% 23.7% 5.4% 6.6%
Title I Schoolwide 49.6 22.4 19.2 3.9 4.9
Title I Targeted          
Percent of School in Poverty          
  00-34          
  75-100          
LEP Students 78.6 16.1 1.8 0 3.6
Migrant students          

Grade 10

Reading
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 25.2% 21.1% 49.1% 3.1% 1.5%
Title I 64.0 22.0 14.0 0 0
Title I Targeted          

 

Mathematics
  Well Below the Standard Below the Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Distinguished
All Students 42.3% 27.2% 20.7% 3.4% 6.5%
Title I 76.0 20.0 4.0 0 0
Title I Targeted          

 

Top

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 25% 25%
Basic level and above 57% 66%
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above n/a n/a
Basic level and above n/a n/a

Top


Sources


[Connecticut] | [District of Columbia]

This page last modified—December 27, 2002 (jer).

Technical questions about the Web site: webmaster@ed.gov