ED Seal
Table of contents
Title page
Introduction
Acknowledgments
National Summary
State Profiles
-Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Sources
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Full report in PDF format (956K)

State Education Indicators With a Focus on Title I

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Arkansas
http://arkedu.state.ar.us


School and Teacher Demographics

Number of districts
(CCD, 1998-99)
311

Number of public schools in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
574 180 325 3 24

Student/teacher ratio
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High
20:1 23:1 24:1

Number of FTE teachers in state
(CCD, 1998-99)
Elementary Middle High Combined Other
11,014 3,840 5,406 35 655

Public school enrollment
  1989-90 1998-99
K-8
(CCD)
311,060 316,637
9-12
(CCD)
123,900 132,507
Pre-K
(by state definition)
n/a 1,390

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1996-97)

State 57.7%, Local 31.4%, Federal 10.8%, Intermediate 0.1%

Top


Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1989-90 1998-99
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 0.2% 0.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 0.6 0.8
Black 24.0 23.5
Hispanic 0.4 2.5
White 74.8 72.8

Students with disabilities
(OSEP, K-12)
1990-91 1998-99
9.7% 11.0%

Limited English proficient
(USED/NCBE, K-12)
1989-90 1996-97
n/a 5,282

Migrant
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1998-99
11,344 15,047

High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)
1993-94 1997-98
4.9% 5.4%

Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)
1994-95 1997-98
48% 54%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program*
(CCD, 1998-99)

For 0 to 34%, 458 schools; 35 to 49%, 320 schools; 50 to 74%, 238 schools; and 75 to 100%, 89 schools.

*One school did not report

Top


Statewide Accountability Information

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
(Developing by 2001-02) 100% students proficient in 10 years.
Rewards & sanctions.

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Yearly progress to meet 100% in 10 years.

Indicators for School Accountability
CRT scores

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Target for Schools
Transition (same as statewide 2001-02)

Schools Meeting Title I AYP Goal
284 (36.3%)

Top


Title I Schools

Title I enrollment
(USED)
  1998-99
K-8 147,129
9-12 13,979
Pre-K n/a

Race/ethnicity
(USED, K-12)
  Schoolwide Targeted
Assistance
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 425 133
Asian/Pacific Islander 972 135
Black 51,475 9,330
Hispanic 4,229 1,701
White 67,234 29,026

Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, USED, 1998-99)
$81,111,433

Number of schools with Title I programs
Schoolwide vs. targeted assistance (USED)

In 1996, 71 schools with schoolwide programs and 841 schools with targeted assistance; in 1998, 358 schoolwide, 431 targeted assistance; in 1999, 381 schoolwide, 402 targeted assistance

Top


Assessment Information

Assessment Reported
Stanford Achievement Test, Version 9

Progress Toward Assessment Aligned with Standards
Performance standards did not meet review criteria of the U.S. Department of Education.

State Definition of "Proficient"
Student results are placed in quartiles, there is no definition of proficient

Exclusion from Assessment
No information provided

Other Assessments
No information provided

Top


Student Achievement 1998-1999

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Grade 5

Reading/LanguageArts
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 27.8% 24.4% 23.9% 23.9%
Title I Schoolwide 35.6 24.9 21.1 18.3
Title I Targeted 25.8 24.3 24.7 25.1
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students        
Migrant students        

 

Mathematics
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 30.4% 26.4% 24.5% 18.7%
Title I Schoolwide 37.6 26.6 21.4 14.5
Title I Targeted 28.2 26.3 25.6 20.0
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students        
Migrant students        

Grade 7

Reading/LanguageArts
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 28.8% 25.9% 23.1% 22.1%
Title I Schoolwide 40.3 26.4 19.6 13.7
Title I Targeted 29.1 26.7 23.3 21.0
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students        
Migrant students        

 

Mathematics
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 30.5% 25.0% 23.8% 20.7%
Title I Schoolwide 38.5 25.5 20.9 15.1
Title I Targeted 28.7 25.7 24.4 21.3
Percent of School in Poverty        
  00-34        
  75-100        
LEP Students        
Migrant students        

Grade 10

Reading
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 28.7% 27.6% 25.4% 18.3%
Title I Schoolwide 38.5 28.1 20.4 13.0
Title I Targeted 34.2 27.4 23.4 15.0

 

Mathematics
  Bottom Lower Middle Upper Middle Top
All Students 17.6% 28.3% 34.6% 19.5%
Title I Schoolwide 23.6 32.6 30.7 13.0
Title I Targeted 21.0 30.2 31.8 16.9

Top

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 23% 23%
Basic level and above 55% 68%
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above 14% 14%
Basic level and above 57% 52%

Top


Sources


[Arizona] | [California]

This page last modified—December 27, 2002 (jer).

Technical questions about the Web site: webmaster@ed.gov