A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Guidance for Class-Size Reduction Program: April 2000

Section H. Accountability

Public accountability is an essential feature of any major investment of public funds. Parents, teachers, and policy-makers must learn which approaches to class-size reduction are most likely to result in improved student achievement, and why.

H-1 What reports will States submit?

Each State receiving funds will report on Class-Size Reduction activities in the State as part of the report States already file under Title VI of the ESEA. The report is due every two years and is described in section 6202(a)(2)(A) of the ESEA. The first of these reports that includes Class-Size Reduction information will be due in December 2001. The next such report will be due in December 2003;the Department of Education will issue further guidance on the content of this report, but envisions that the information will be similar to the information that these guidelines suggest be included in an LEA application. (See E-3.)

In addition, each State is required to publicly report to parents on:

H-2 What reporting requirements apply to LEAs?

Each LEA that participates in the Class-Size Reduction Program is also required to publicly report to parents on:

States and LEAs may work out these reporting procedures to meet local needs. The following are some of the items that LEAs may wish to include in their annual reports:

H-3 What kind of accountability will there be for participating schools?

Any school or school district receiving Class-Size Reduction funds must provide to parents, upon request, the professional qualifications of their child's teacher.

H-4 Will the Department of Education conduct a National evaluation of the Class-Size Reduction program?

Yes, plans to conduct a national evaluation are being developed. The Department will be notifying States and LEAs about these evaluations and about the requirements of States and LEAs to participate, as necessary. The Department intends to include the basic information that States provided on subgrantees under the first year of the program to compile data on early implementation of the program, and is focusing on a careful measurement of class-size changes together with such issues as methods used by schools to reduce class size, the quality of the teachers hired, recruitment methods, and professional development provided.


-###-
[Section G. Flexibility To Meet Local Needs] [Table of Contents] [Appendix 1. FY2000 Estimated State Allotments]