A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Background Paper for the Expert Panel on Educational Technology--August 31, 1998


Bibliography

Anglin, G. (Ed.). (1995). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.

Becker, H. J. (1998). The influence of computer and internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Department of Education: University of California, Irvine.

Braun, L. (1990). Vision: TEST (Technologically Enriched Schools of Tomorrow). Final report: Recommendations for American educational decision makers.

Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1995). The fourth revolution: Instructional technology in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Coley, R.J., Cradler, J., and Engel, P.K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Dwyer, David. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we?ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.

Expert Panel on Mathematics and Science Education. (1998). Guidelines and materials for submitting mathematics programs for review. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Federal Register.(11/17/97).Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) Conduct and activities evaluation standards; Designation of exemplary and promising programs; Final rule. 34 CFR Part 701. vol. 62. No. 222. 61427-61432.

Fulton, K., Feldman, A., Wasser, J.D., Rubin, A., Grant, C.M., McConachie, M., Spitzer, W., McNamara, E., and Porter, B. (1996). Technology infusion and school change: Perspectives and practices. Cambridge MA: TERC.

Fulton, K. (1998). Learning in a digital age: Insights into the issues. The skills students need for technological fluency. T.H.E. Journal, 25(7), 60-63.

Glennan, T.K. and Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: elements of a national strategy. Santa Monica CA: RAND.

Herschbach, D.R., Hayes, F.B., and Evans, D.P. (1992). 1992 Vocational education and training review of experience. Washington DC: US Agency for International Development.

Illinois State Board of Education.1996). K-12 Information technology plan. Springfield IL: Illinois State Board of Education.

International Society for Technology in Education.(1998) National educational technology standards for students. Eugene OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Means, B. and Olson, K. (1994). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 15-18.

Means, B and Olson, K.(1995). Technology's role within constructivist classrooms. Paper presented as part of a symposium: Teachers, Technology, and Authentic Tasks: Lessons From Within and Across Classrooms. American Educational Research Association. April, 1995. San Francisco, CA.

Means, B. and Olson, K. (1995). Technology?s role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Nleya, P.T. (1998). Improving the computer literacy of young people: The case of Botswana. T.H.E. Journal. 25(6).

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (1997). The research on technology for learning. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection.(OTA-CHR-616). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Peck, K. L, and Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51 (7), 11-13.

President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology. (1997).Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President. March.

Riley, R.W.(1996). Getting America?s students ready for the 21st Century. Meeting the technology literacy challenge. A report to the Nation on technology and education. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Sheingold, K. and Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education. Center for Technology in Education.

Sivin-Kachala, J. and Bialo, E.R. (1997). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, ?95-?96. Washington DC: Software Publishers Association.

Websites

Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Research:

Bellingham Public Schools Technology Plan

Generation WHY

Jacobs, J. Technology is good, but learning is better.

Norris, Smolka, & Soloway. Convergent Analysis: Extracting the Value from Research Studies on Technology in Education

Regional Educational Laboratories

Imapct of Technology

Planning for Learning Through the Use of Technology

See, J. Developing Effective Technology.

Shariro, J., & Hughes, S. (1996) Information Literacy as a Liberal Art: Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum. Educom Review. 31(2).

Software Publishers Association

TERC

U.S. Department of Education

Benefits of Technology Use

Challenges and Strategies in Using Technology to Promote Education Reform


-###-


[V. Conclusion]  [Table of Contents]  [Appendix A]