 |
| An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities
(Aug 17, 2009)
|
| This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years). |
Microsoft Word document
(85KB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(168KB)
|
|
| Spanish Language Fact Sheet -- Fondo de Estabilizacion Fiscal Estatal—Segunda Fase
(Jul 30, 2009)
|
| Esta hoja de datos habla sobre el State Fiscal Stabilization Fund o Fondo de Estabilizacion Fiscal Estatal, SFSF por sus siglas en ingles, que brinda aproximadamente $48.6 mil millones directamente a los gobernadores para ayudar a salvar los puestos de empleo e impulsar la reforma educativa. |
|
| Spanish Language Fact Sheet -- Sistemas Estatales de Datos Longitudinales
(Jul 30, 2009)
|
| Esta hoja de datos habla de los subvenciones a los estados para diseñar, desarrollar e implementar sistemas estatales de datos longitudinales P-20 para capturar, analizar y utilizar los datos del estudiante desde el nivel preescolar hasta la secundaria, la universidad y el ámbito laboral. |
|
| Fact Sheet -- State Fiscal Stabilization Fund—Phase Two
(Jul 24, 2009)
|
| Fact sheet about phase 2 of the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund grant process. |
|
| Fact Sheet -- Race to the Top
(Jul 24, 2009)
|
| Fact sheet about the Race to the Top Fund. |
|
| Fact Sheet -- Investing in Innovation Fund
(Jul 24, 2009)
|
| Fact sheet about the Investing in Innovation Fund. |
|
| Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program States
(Jul 01, 2009)
|
| This page includes information about the differentiated accountability pilot project which provides an opportunity for states to propose their own methods for categorizing identified schools and determining the interventions required for each category. this pilot will allow states the flexibility to focus more precisely their technical assistance and interventions (under section 1116 of ESEA) on schools with the greatest need. |
|
| Decision Letters on State Final Assessment Systems
(Jun 26, 2009)
|
| Decision letters on each State's final assessment system under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 are linked from this page. |
|
| May 10, 2009 - Virginia Assessment Letter
(Jun 09, 2009)
|
| Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated May 10, 2009.) |
|
| National Advisory Council (NTAC)
(Feb 24, 2009)
|
| The National Advisory Council (NTAC) is a 16 member group appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Education to Advise on State Standards, Assessments and Accountability Systems |
|
