[Federal Register: October 16, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 200)]
[Notices]
[Page 61245-61247]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16oc00-144]
[[Page 61245]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities National Programs; Grant Competition To Prevent
High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among College Students; Models
on College Campuses Grant Competition; Notices
[[Page 61246]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education--Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--Grant
Competition To Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among
College Students
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Priorities and Proposed Selection Criteria
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 and Subsequent Years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for the Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education proposes priorities and selection criteria under
the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Programs--
Federal Activities--Grant Competition to Prevent High-Risk Drinking and
Violent Behavior Among College Students. The Assistant Secretary may
use these priorities and selection criteria for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2001 and later years.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before November 15, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about these proposed priorities and
proposed selection criteria to Richard Lucey, Jr., U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 3E252, Washington, DC 20202-
6123. If you prefer to send your comments through the Internet, use the
following address:
richard_lucey@ed.gov
You must include the phrase ``Grant Competition to Prevent High-
yRisk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among College Students'' in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Lucey, Jr., (202) 205-5471. If
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate
format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed in the preceding paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
priorities and proposed selection criteria.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
priorities and proposed selection criteria. Please let us know of any
further opportunities we should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed priorities and proposed selection
criteria in Room 3E252, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed priorities and proposed selection
criteria. If you want to schedule an appointment for this type of aid,
you may call (202) 205-8113 or (202) 260-9895. If you use a TDD, you
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-
8339.
General
In making awards under this grant program, the Assistant Secretary
may take into consideration the geographic distribution of the projects
in addition to the rank order of applicants.
Contingent upon the availability of funds, the Assistant Secretary
may make additional awards in FY 2002 from the rank-ordered list of
nonfunded applications from this competition.
Discussion of Priorities
We will announce the final priorities and selection criteria in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will determine the final priorities
and selection criteria after considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or funding additional priorities, subject to
meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which the Assistant Secretary chooses to use these proposed
priorities and proposed selection criteria, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Definitions
``High-risk drinking'' is defined as those situations that may
involve but not be limited to: binge drinking (commonly defined as five
or more drinks on any one occasion); underage drinking; drinking and
driving; drinking in conjunction with situations when one's condition
is already impaired by another cause, such as depression or emotional
stress; or combining alcohol and medications, such as tranquilizers,
sedatives, and antihistamines.
``Specific student populations'' can include but not be limited to
student athletes, members of fraternities and sororities, students
attending two-year institutions of higher education, and first-year
students.
Priorities: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) and the Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities Act of 1994, the Assistant Secretary proposes
to give an absolute preference to applications that meet either of the
following priorities, and would fund under this competition only those
applications that meet either of the following absolute priorities:
Absolute Priority #1--Develop or Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
Campus-and/or Community-Based Strategies to Prevent High-Risk Drinking
Among College Students. Under this proposed priority, applicants would
be required to propose projects that:
(1) Identify a specific student population to be served by the
grant and provide a justification for its selection;
(2) Provide evidence that a needs assessment has been conducted on
campus to document prevalence rates related to high-risk drinking by
the population selected;
(3) Set measurable goals and objectives for the proposed project
and provide a description of how progress toward achieving goals will
be measured annually;
(4) Design and implement prevention strategies, using student input
and participation, that research has shown to be effective in
preventing high-risk drinking by the target population;
(5) Use a qualified evaluator to design and implement an evaluation
of the project using outcomes-based (summative) performance indicators
related to behavioral change and process (formative) measures that
assess and document the strategies used; and
(6) Demonstrate the ability to start the project within 60 days
after receiving Federal funding in order to maximize the time available
to show impact within the grant period.
Absolute Priority #2--Develop or Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
Campus-and/or Community-Based Strategies to Prevent Violent Behavior
Among College Students. Under this proposed priority, applicants would
be required to propose projects that:
[[Page 61247]]
(1) Identify a specific student population to be served by the
grant and provide a justification for its selection;
(2) Provide evidence that a needs assessment has been conducted on
campus to document prevalence rates related to violent behavior;
(3) Set measurable goals and objectives for the proposed project
and provide a description of how progress toward achieving goals will
be measured annually;
(4) Design and implement prevention strategies, using student input
and participation, that research has shown to be effective in
preventing violent behavior among college students;
(5) Use a qualified evaluator to design and implement an evaluation
of the project using outcomes-based (summative) performance indicators
related to behavioral change and process (formative) measures that
assess and document the strategies used; and
(6) Demonstrate the ability to start the project within 60 days
after receiving Federal funding in order to maximize the time available
to show impact within the grant period.
Selection Criteria: The Assistant Secretary proposes to use the
following selection criteria to evaluate applications for new grants
under this competition. The maximum score for all of these criteria is
100 points. The maximum score for each criterion or factor under that
criterion is indicated in parentheses.
(1) Need for project (15 points)
In determining the need for the proposed project, the following
factors are considered:
(a) The magnitude or severity of the problem to be addressed by the
proposed project. (10 points)
(b) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses. (5 points)
(2) Significance (20 points)
In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
following factors are considered:
(a) The likelihood that the proposed project will result in system
change or improvement. (5 points)
(b) The potential contribution of the proposed project to the
development and advancement of theory, knowledge, and practices in the
field of study. (10 points)
(c) The extent to which the proposed project involves the
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (5 points)
(3) Quality of the project design (30 Points)
In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project,
the following factors are considered:
(a) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(10 points)
(b) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs. (5 points)
(c) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice. (10 points)
(d) The extent to which the proposed project will establish
linkages with other appropriate agencies and organizations providing
services to the target population. (5 points)
(4) Quality of project personnel (10 points)
In determining the quality of project personnel, the following
factors are considered:
(a) The extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability. (3 points)
(b) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel. (7 points)
(5) Quality of the project evaluation (25 points)
In determining the quality of the evaluation, the following factors
are considered:
(a) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project. (10 points)
(b) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible. (10 points)
(c) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes. (5 points)
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Electronic Access To This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at either of the
following sites:
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html
To use PDF, you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at either of the previous sites. If you have questions
about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) toll
free at (888) 293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-
1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.184H Office of
Elementary and Secondary Education--Safe and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--Grant Competition
to Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among College
Students)
Dated: October 12, 2000.
Michael Cohen,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 00-26593 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-U