[Federal Register: April 6, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 18195-18197]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06ap00-140]
[[Page 18195]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part V
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education--Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--Grant
Competition To Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among
College Students; Notice
[[Page 18196]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education--Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--Grant
Competition To Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among
College Students
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priorities, definitions, and selection
criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary announces final priorities, definitions, and
selection criteria for fiscal year (FY) 2000 under the Safe and Drug-
Free Schools and Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--
Grant Competition to Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior
Among College Students. The Secretary may use one or more of these
priorities, definitions, and selection criteria for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2001 and later years. The Secretary takes this action
to focus Federal financial assistance on an identified national need.
This competition seeks to prevent high-risk drinking and violent
behavior among college students.
EFFECTIVE DATE: These priorities, definitions, and selection criteria
are effective May 8, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Lucey, Jr., U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW--Room 3E252, Washington, DC 20202-
6123. Telephone: (202) 205-5471. If you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding
paragraph.
Note: This notice of final priorities does not solicit
applications. A notice inviting applications under this competition
is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The
notice inviting applications will specify the date and time by which
applications for this competition must be received by the
Department. Applications received after that time will not be
eligible for funding. Postmarked dates will not be accepted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary published a notice of proposed
priorities, definitions, and selection criteria for this competition in
the Federal Register on February 14, 2000 (65 FR 7372-7374). Except for
minor editorial revisions, there are no differences between the notice
of proposed priorities, definitions, and selection criteria and this
notice of final priorities, definitions, and selection criteria.
Public Comment
In the notice of proposed priorities, definitions and selection
criteria, the Secretary invited comments on the proposed priorities,
definitions, and selection criteria. We did not receive any substantive
comments.
Definitions
1. ``Two-year institutions of higher education (IHEs)'' are defined
as those IHEs or branches of IHEs that are public or private nonprofit
organizations and confer at least a two-year formal award (certificate,
diploma, or associate's degree), or have a two-year program creditable
toward a baccalaureate degree or higher award.
2. ``High-risk drinking'' is defined as those situations that may
involve but not be limited to: binge drinking (commonly defined as five
or more drinks on any one occasion); underage drinking; drinking and
driving; situations when one's condition is already impaired by another
cause, such as depression or emotional stress; or combining alcohol and
medications, such as tranquilizers, sedatives, and antihistamines.
General
In making awards under this grant program, the Secretary may take
into consideration the geographic distribution of the projects in
addition to the rank order of applicants.
Contingent upon the availability of funds, the Secretary may make
additional awards in FY 2001 from the rank-ordered list of nonfunded
applications from this competition.
Priorities: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) and the Safe and Drug-Free
Schools and Communities Act of 1994, the Secretary gives an absolute
preference to applications that meet one or both of the following
priorities, and funds under this competition only those applications
that meet one or both of the following absolute priorities:
Absolute Priority #1--Develop or Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
Campus-Based Strategies To Prevent High-Risk Drinking by College
Student Athletes, First-Year Students, or Students Attending Two-Year
Institutions
Under this priority, applicants are required to propose projects
that develop or enhance, implement, and evaluate strategies to prevent
high-risk drinking by college student athletes, first-year students, or
students attending two-year institutions of higher education. Grant
applicants are required to:
(1) Identify the target population and provide a justification for
its selection;
(2) Provide evidence that a needs assessment has been conducted on
campus to document prevalence rates related to high-risk drinking by
the population selected;
(3) Set measurable goals and objectives for the proposed project
and provide a description of how progress toward achieving goals will
be measured annually;
(4) Design and implement prevention strategies, using student input
and participation, that research has shown to be effective in
preventing high-risk drinking by the target population;
(5) Use a qualified evaluator to design and implement an evaluation
of the project using outcomes-based (summative) performance indicators
related to behavioral change and process (formative) measures that
assess and document the strategies used; and
(6) Demonstrate the ability to start the project within 60 days
after receiving Federal funding in order to maximize the time available
to show impact within the grant period.
Absolute Priority #2--Develop or Enhance, Implement, and Evaluate
Campus-Based Strategies To Prevent Violent Behavior by College Students
Under this priority, applicants must propose projects that develop
or enhance, implement, and evaluate strategies to prevent violent
behavior by college students. Grant applicants are required to:
(1) Provide evidence that a needs assessment has been conducted on
campus to document prevalence rates related to violent behavior;
(2) Set measurable goals and objectives for the proposed project
and provide a description of how progress toward achieving goals will
be measured annually;
(3) Design and implement prevention strategies, using student input
and participation, that research has shown to be effective in
preventing violent behavior among college students;
(4) Use a qualified evaluator to design and implement an evaluation
of the project using outcomes-based (summative) performance indicators
related to behavioral change and process (formative) measures that
assess and document the strategies used; and
(5) Demonstrate the ability to start the project within 60 days
after receiving
[[Page 18197]]
Federal funding in order to maximize the time available to show impact
within the grant period.
Selection Criteria
The Secretary uses the following selection criteria to evaluate
applications for new grants under this competition. The maximum score
for all of these criteria is 100 points. The maximum score for each
criterion or factor under that criterion is indicated in parentheses.
(1) Need for project. (15 points)
In determining the need for the proposed project, the following
factors are considered:
(a) The magnitude or severity of the problem to be addressed by the
proposed project. (10 points)
(b) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses. (5 points)
(2) Significance. (20 points)
In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
following factors are considered:
(a) The likelihood that the proposed project will result in system
change or improvement. (5 points)
(b) The potential contribution of the proposed project to the
development and advancement of theory, knowledge, and practices in the
field of study. (10 points)
(c) The extent to which the proposed project involves the
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (5 points)
(3) Quality of the project design. (30 points)
In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project,
the following factors are considered:
(a) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(10 points)
(b) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs. (5 points)
(c) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice. (10 points)
(d) The extent to which the proposed project will establish
linkages with other appropriate agencies and organizations providing
services to the target population. (5 points)
(4) Quality of project personnel. (10 points)
In determining the quality of project personnel, the following
factors are considered:
(a) The extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability. (3 points)
(b) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel. (7 points)
(5) Quality of the project evaluation. (25 points)
In determining the quality of the evaluation, the following factors
are considered:
(a) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project. (10 points)
(b) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible. (10 points)
(c) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes. (5 points)
Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the
objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination
and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at either of the
following sites:
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html
To use the PDF, you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with
Search, which is available free at either of the previous sites. If you
have questions about using the PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing
Office (GPO) toll free at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area
at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.184H Office of
Elementary and Secondary Education--Safe and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities National Programs--Federal Activities--Grant Competition
to Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Violent Behavior Among College
Students)
Dated: March 31, 2000.
Michael Cohen,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 00-8451 Filed 4-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-U