Universal Preschool is a Sure Path to the Middle Class

This op-ed appeared in the Apr. 19, edition of the Washington Post.

President Obama put forward a plan last week to make access to high-quality early learning a reality for every 4-year-old in America by making full-day preschool available to families with incomes at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty line.

Parents, teachers and principals nationwide agree that we need to do more to ensure that children from disadvantaged families begin kindergarten at the same educational starting line as do children from better-off families. The president’s plan includes a cost-sharing arrangement with states, with the entire federal investment of $75 billion covered by a new cigarette tax, and with incentives for states to make programs available for even more middle-class families.

Members of Congress have asked me: How do we know early learning works? What about its lasting impact?

Let’s examine the record.

At an elementary school I recently visited in Bladensburg, teachers told me how much better-prepared students are for the classroom if they’ve been to preschool. “It makes a huge difference,” said one 21-year teacher.

Research backs her up. Studies consistently demonstrate that high-quality early education gives children the foundation they need to succeed. No study is perfect, but the cumulative evidence that high-quality preschool works is overwhelming. Consider a study of 4-year-olds in Tulsa who attended Oklahoma’s high-quality universal preschool program, with small class sizes and well-trained teachers — features that are components of the president’s proposal. They started kindergarten seven months ahead in literacy skills and four months ahead in math skills. Likewise, children who attended Boston’s high-quality preschool program gained seven months in literacy and math. Studies of preschoolers in New Jersey showed substantial gains in literacy and math. These consistent gains are critical steps toward long-term success in school.

Skeptics of early learning say these programs “don’t work” because some studies have failed to find major effects in later grades — the so-called “fade out.” But that’s not quite right.

The most rigorous research that can be compared with what we are proposing — high-quality, full-day preschool — shows crucial benefits in high school graduation rates, employment and avoidance of criminal behavior. Although the best scientific evidence for the long-term effects of early education comes from studies of multiyear programs dating to the 1960s and 1970s, a recent study of New Jersey students who received one year of high-quality public preschool found that by fifth grade, they were less likely to be held back or placed in special education. The few more recent long-term assessments of public preschool consistently indicate similar benefits, including increased graduation rates and reduced arrest rates.

High-quality preschool appears to propel better outcomes by enhancing non-cognitive skills such as persistence, self-control and emotion regulation — skills that depend on early brain development and social experiences and contribute to long-term academic outcomes and career success.

The study often cited by skeptics — the Head Start Impact Study — isn’t a great comparison to the president’s proposal. It examined the effect of offering access to Head Start, not the effect of participation (nearly 20 percent of the 4-year-olds in the Head Start group never attended). The president’s proposal would require higher qualifications for staff than was the case in this study, and this administration has begun putting in place needed quality-control improvements to Head Start.

Preschool works. But is it worth the cost?

Studies of the savings from high-quality early learning demonstrate that the answer is yes. Graduates of such programs are less likely to commit crimes or rely on food stamps and cash assistance; they have greater lifetime earnings, creating increased tax revenue. Although the range of savings varies across studies, the studies consistently find robust returns to taxpayers.

Can we replicate what works? We can, and we must. If the United States is to remain a global economic leader, high-quality preschool must become the norm. The moral case is compelling, too. As President Obama has said, every child should have the opportunity, through hard work, to join the middle class. Children shouldn’t be denied equal educational opportunity at the starting line.

The countries we compete with economically are well ahead of us in preschool opportunity. We rank 28th in the proportion of 4-year-olds enrolled in early learning in surveys by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and 25th in public funding for early learning. Fortunately, we have great examples to learn from: Oklahoma, Georgia, New Jersey and Boston all have excellent preschool programs.

Making quality early-learning opportunities a norm for every 4-year-old will take more than money. It will take a new commitment to recruiting and keeping excellent staff, and tackling many of the other challenges in our K-12 system. That’s why we propose to invest an additional $750 million to support innovation and preschool capacity-building in states. To make a critical difference for all children, high-quality early learning must be followed by rich educational opportunities and robust learning experiences at every stage of the journey to college and careers.

The evidence is clear. We need to stop asking whether early learning works — and start asking whether we have the national will to make it a reality for the children who need it most.

Source information about studies mentioned in this column has been posted at www.ed.gov/early-learning/research.

Arne Duncan is U.S. Secretary of Education.

8 Comments

  1. I don’t have any words to appreciate this post…..I am really impressed …. Thanks for sharing this with us

  2. I agree. Most of the children and families receiving services from Head Start are low income and disadvantaged. This program focuses on the “whole family”. Most of these children come from young, single moms or very young couple families who have very little or no knowledge about child development. My husband and I were a young couple who were fortunate to connect with Head Start. As young parents we had very little knowledge of the fact that children go through developmental stages from the time of birth. Head Start assisted us by connecting us with community agencies that offer parenting classes and other services that are crucial to helping young families get through one of life’s most difficult challenges, raising a healthy family. As parents of Head Start children, having their support helped us break the cycle of being a single parent, migrant family. Being a Head Start parent, I was given the opportunity to volunteer in the program and eventually became part of the staff. The program encouraged me to continue my education and earn a college degree. I took advantage of this and with their support I went on to further educate myself to help provide a better life for our family. I am the first in my family to earn a college degree. My husband and I have raised a family of four with two of our children earning a college degree and another one in the process. I truly believe that it is due to the support of the Head Start program who not only provides services to the child but to the family as a whole.

    • I agree with Mr. Duncan’s basic viewpoint; however, I am not convinced the economic problems are the most challenging to overcome. I am skeptical of any panacea offered in education because the social factors driving phenomena like these (maladaptive learning practice, academic failure, illiteracy, etc.) are complex and multifacted. Consider that the subjects in this study were among the lowest performing of the bottom quartile. This program discussed here responds to those factors identified by the literature as indictors of future academic difficulty among learners with those particular problems. There are questions regarding the extent to which a program like this will scale on state
      or national levels and if it does, will the gains seen in the study’s targeted population hold true
      for the rest of the students in jeopardy af academic failure?

  3. I agree with almost everything Secretary Duncan espoused. However, I do beleive that there are also serious issues in the middle and upper years of education attainment that require more than national will and tons of funding. What I speak of can only be solved by creating a sustained culture of educational appreciation and excellence in families. There is no signfigant learning without a signifgant relationship

  4. As a special education teacher, of 30+ years, I can attest to the success of children who attended QUALITY preschool. These children were not only academically prepared but also emotionally prepared.

    • What a croc! Preschool is the biggest boondoggle ever perpetrated on the American people. No one ever asks, “What studies?” “Who did these studies?” “How were the questions worded in the surveys?” Where were the samples taken?” “How were these studies structured?” AND “Who has the most to gain from these “so called” studies?” Billions of taxpayer dollars have been poured into early education and it has little effect overall on student achievement. It is the “easy answer” that politicos love to espouse. Children are much better off staying home, playing, and just being a kid. There is no time to even begin to discuss the agenda the government has in supporting preschools. I spent 40 years in education as a special ed teacher, regular classroom teacher at elementary, Jr. High and High school, as well as several years in administration. Early education is a black hole and the government loves to say it works because there is little effective measurement that they have to provide to substantiate it. All they have to do is say, “studies show” and “It is a “Sure Path to the Middle Class” and uniformed citizens buy it!

      • Given your attitude toward education it is a misfortune that you were apart of this field for so long. Living in one of the poorest regions in my state and working for Head Start, I can affirm that preschool is a necessity to give our children the foundation that they need. It is not a “black hole” but a spring board up the ladder for many low-income students.

      • You may be correct if there would be a home in which to stay that has anything other than negative influences; role models who use language that is negative/abusive/derogatory along with the physical abuse amd little or no positive reinforcement of acceptable behavior

Comments are closed.