LEAD & MANAGE MY SCHOOL
Are You Making Progress? Increasing Accountability Through Evaluation

Advantages of Participatory Evaluation

The participatory approach to evaluation offers many benefits to program staff and stakeholders, including the following:

  • It promotes shared expectations. When an evaluation plan is developed collaboratively, there is less potential for misunderstanding and an increased likelihood that all involved will be "on the same page."

  • Personal investment improves quality. Program staff and stakeholders tend to have a greater personal investment in the evaluation than evaluation professionals. Their ongoing participation helps ensure that the program will be assessed carefully and treated fairly.

  • It empowers program staff. By deepening their understanding of good research, it enhances their capacities to conduct their own research and review the research of others.

  • It increases the likelihood that the research questions and data collection methods will be appropriate and relevant for the target populations. Program staff and stakeholders may be more knowledgeable than an evaluator about the needs, culture, and circumstances of the target population.

One of the negative connotations often associated with evaluation is that it is something done to people. One is evaluated. Participatory evaluation, in contrast, is a process controlled by the people in the program or community. It is something they undertake as a formal, reflective process for their own development and empowerment.

-- M. Patton. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p. 129.

  • It increases the chance that results will be used. When staff are integrally involved in the evaluation process, they are more likely to understand, accept, and apply the findings of the evaluation.

  • It is more flexible and less costly than traditional models. With more people involved, the balance of responsibilities can shift as needed throughout the duration of the project. Furthermore, with program staff on board to help, fewer tasks fall to the more costly evaluator.


   4 | 5 | 6
TOC
Print this page Printable view Send this page Share this page
Last Modified: 12/11/2007