ESEA: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - FY 2007
|
CFDA Number:
|
84.010
- Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
|
|
Program Goal: At-risk students improve their achievement to meet challenging standards.
|
|
|
Objective
1 of 2:
The performance of low-income students will increase substantially in reading and mathematics.
|
|
Indicator 1.1 of 2: Fourth-grade reading proficiency: The number of states administering fourth-grade reading assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
|
| |
|
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of fourth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in reading on state assessments.
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
September 2006
Explanation: SY 2002-03 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-05 data to 2003-04 data.
|
|
Indicator 1.2 of 2: Eighth-grade mathematics proficiency: The number of states administering eighth-grade mathematics assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either the proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
|
| |
|
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of eighth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in mathematics on state assessments.
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report; EDEN
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
September 2006
Explanation: SY 2002-03 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-05 data to SY 2003-04 data.
|
|
Objective
2 of 2:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status
|
|
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Making AYP: The number of states that report an increase in schools making AYP.
|
| |
|
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of schools making AYP.
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report; EDEN
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
September 2006
Explanation: School year 2002-2003 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-2005 data to SY 2003-2004 data.
|
Return to table of contents
Last Modified: 01/27/2006
