|
Indicator 8.1.1 of 2: The percentage of states that have aligned English language proficiency standards and assessments in place.
|
|
Targets and Performance Data
|
Assessment of Progress
|
Sources and Data Quality
|
|
Percentage of states that have developed English language proficiency standards
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
The percentage of states that have selected and administered English language proficiency assessments
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
The percentage of states that have demonstrated the alignment of English language proficiency (ELP) standards with ELP assessments
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
The percentage of states that have demonstrated how their English language proficiency standards are linked to academic content standards in English language arts or reading
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Progress: (Performance Measurement Set 3 & 4) Projections are based on the current rate of progress made by the States in developing or revising their English language proficiency standards and assessments.
|
Additional Source Information: NCLB Biennial Evaluation Reports
Data Available:
May
2004
|
|
Indicator 8.1.2 of 2: The percentage of students who attain English language proficiency.
|
|
Targets and Performance Data
|
Assessment of Progress
|
Sources and Data Quality
|
|
Of limited English-proficient students who have received Title III services for three academic years, the percentage who have attained English language proficiency
|
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Progress: Target is subject to adjustment based on the States' September 2003 submission.
|
Additional Source Information: NCLB Biennial Evaluation Reports
Collection Period: 2003 - 2004
Data Available:
May
2004
|
